Literature DB >> 19696642

Noninvasive estimation of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: usefulness of visceral fat area measurement.

Noriyo Yamashiki1, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Sumihito Tamura, Junichi Kaneko, Yuichi Matsui, Junichi Togashi, Takamasa Ohki, Haruhiko Yoshida, Masao Omata, Masatoshi Makuuchi, Norihiro Kokudo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic steatosis in the donor liver is associated with an increased risk of complications after liver transplantation. Mandatory liver biopsy for all potential donors, however, remains controversial. To define clinico-pathological correlation, we reviewed our criteria for liver biopsy and examined the use of visceral fat area (VFA) estimation by computed tomography image.
METHODS: Our criteria for biopsy are as follows: an aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio of less than 1, a body mass index more than or equal to 25 kg/m2, and a suspected fatty liver on ultrasonography. Dietary intervention is indicated for overweight donor candidates and for those with more than 10% hepatic steatosis. Clinical data of consecutive 78 potential donors who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy (biopsy group) and 70 donors whose biopsy were omitted (control group) were reviewed.
RESULTS: Donors in biopsy group were male dominant with a median age of 35 (20-63) years. Hepatic steatosis more than or equal to 10% was seen in nine of 78 donors; older age (P=0.012), ultrasonographic findings (P=0.002), VFA (P=0.008), and percent VFA (VFA/[VFA+subcutaneous fat area]; P=0.009) were associated with more than 10% hepatic steatosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of VFA and percent VFA for detecting hepatic steatosis more than or equal to 10% were 0.803 and 0.778, respectively. Hepatic steatosis was successfully reduced to less than 10% through dietary intervention in six of the nine donor candidates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our current biopsy criteria are acceptable to select donor candidates at risk for hepatic steatosis. Visceral fat measurement can be used as an additional factor to narrow donors at risk and to monitor visceral fat reduction during dietary intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19696642     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b11c19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruben Hernaez; Mariana Lazo; Susanne Bonekamp; Ihab Kamel; Frederick L Brancati; Eliseo Guallar; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Impact of the donor body mass index on the survival of pediatric liver transplant recipients and post-transplant obesity.

Authors:  Emily Rothbaum Perito; Sue Rhee; Dave Glidden; John Paul Roberts; Philip Rosenthal
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Jochem R van Werven; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Bedside ultrasound in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Nancy Khov; Amol Sharma; Thomas R Riley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.