Literature DB >> 19695889

Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years.

Friedrich-Christian Riess1, Eva Cramer, Lorenz Hansen, Sandra Schiffelers, Gunther Wahl, Jürgen Wallrath, Stephan Winkel, Peter Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mosaic bioprosthesis is a third-generation stented porcine bioprosthesis combining physiologic fixation and alpha-amino oleic acid (AOA) antimineralisation treatment to improve haemodynamic performance and durability. This single-centre study reports the clinical results, including haemodynamic performance, of the Mosaic bioprosthesis after implant in aortic or mitral position.
METHODS: Between February 1994 and October 1999, 255 patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR; mean age: 67 years, range: 23-82 years) and 47 patients with mitral valve replacement (MVR; mean age: 67 years, range: 41-84 years) were enrolled in this prospective non-randomised clinical trial. Follow-up visits were performed 30 days and 6 months after implant and annually thereafter. The cumulative follow-up was 1976.2 patient-years (pt-yrs) after AVR (median: 8.3 years, maximum: 14.0 years) and 336.9 pt-yrs after mitral valve replacement (MVR) (median: 8.2 years, maximum: 13.3 years).
RESULTS: After AVR, mean systolic gradient and effective orifice area at 4, 8 and 13 years follow-up were 13.3+/-5.6, 15.5+/-7.7 and 16.0+/-7.2 mmHg and 1.8+/-0.5, 1.8+/-0.5 and 1.7+/-0.4 cm(2). After MVR, respective data were 4.7+/-2.1, 4.3+/-1.2 and 5.0 mmHg (only one recording) and 2.2+/-0.7, 2.3+/-0.6 and 1.8 cm(2). Transvalvular regurgitation at 13-year follow-up was mild or less in both the AVR and MVR patients. Thirteen-year survival was 63.1+/-4.5% in the AVR group and 51.2+/-13.6% in the MVR group. Early mortality after AVR and MVR was 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively; late mortality was 3.2%pt-yr(-1) and 3.3%pt-yr(-1), including a valve-related/unexplained mortality of 1.1%pt-yr(-1) and 0.9%pt-yr(-1). Freedom from adverse events in the AVR and MVR group was permanent neurological event: 97.4+/-1.2% and 96.0+/-3.9%; valvular thrombosis: 97.8+/-1.1% and 100%; structural valve deterioration: 84.8+/-7.8% and 93.8+/-6.1%; explant: 73.3+/-7.3% and 89.3+/-6.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mosaic bioprosthesis demonstrates excellent clinical performance and safety after 13 years of follow-up. Continued follow-up will determine whether this new design will provide increased durability. Copyright 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695889     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  7 in total

Review 1.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 2.  Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

3.  Mitral bioprosthetic valve stenosis in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Akimasa Morisaki; Hidekazu Hirai; Yasuyuki Sasaki; Mitsuharu Hosono; Masanori Sakaguchi; Atsushi Nakahira; Hiroyuki Seo; Shigefumi Suehiro
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

4.  The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Stefania Blasi; Andrea De Martino; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Stephanie Wallner; Kurt Ruetzler; Dominik Wiedemann; Marek Ehrlich; Georg Heinze; Thomas Binder; Anton Moritz; Michael J Hiesmayr; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement mitral valves: early hemodynamic performance and clinical results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves.

Authors:  Bo Fu; Xiankun Liu; Runsheng Wei; Qingliang Chen; Zhigang Guo; Nan Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

Authors:  Giovanni A Chiariello; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Olivier Vahdat; Jérôme Van Rothem; Olivier Garcia; Philippe Soula; Pierre Berthoumieu; Issam Abouliatim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.