Literature DB >> 19695867

The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union.

Marc Arbyn1, Matejka Rebolj, Inge M C M De Kok, Murielle Fender, Nikolaus Becker, Marian O'Reilly, Bengt Andrae.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality can be reduced substantially by organised cytological screening at 3 to 5 year intervals, as was demonstrated in the Nordic countries, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and parts of Italy. Opportunistic screening, often proposed at yearly schedules, has also reduced the burden of cervical cancer in some, but not all, of the other old member states (belonging to the European Union since 1995) but at a cost that is several times greater. Well organised screening programmes have the potential to achieve greater participation of the target population at regular intervals, equity of access and high quality. Despite the consistent evidence that organised screening is more efficient than non-organised screening, and in spite of the Cancer Screening Recommendations of the European Council, health authorities of eight old member states (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain) have not yet started national organised implementation of screening for cervical cancer. A decision was made by the Irish government to extend their pilot programme nationally while new regional programmes commenced in Portugal and Spain. Introduction of new methods of prevention, such as HPV screening and prophylactic HPV vaccination, can reduce the burden further, but this will require a high level of organisation with particular attention needed for the maximisation of population coverage, compliance with evidence-based guidelines, monitoring of data enabling continued evaluation and improvement of the preventive programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695867     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  40 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Andrew Bryant; Philippe Beutels; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Elke Van Hoof; Marc Steben; Youlin Qiao; Fang-Hui Zhao; Achim Schneider; Andreas Kaufmann; Joakim Dillner; Lauri Markowitz; Allan Hildesheim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011

Review 3.  p16INK4a immunocytochemistry versus human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jolien Roelens; Miriam Reuschenbach; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Nicolas Wentzensen; Christine Bergeron; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Monitoring of human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  J Dillner; M Arbyn; E Unger; L Dillner
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Cancer detection rates in a population-based, opportunistic screening model, New Delhi, India.

Authors:  Krithiga Shridhar; Subhojit Dey; Chandra Mohan Bhan; Dipika Bumb; Jyostna Govil; Preet K Dhillon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015

Review 6.  Cervical cancer screening in developing countries at a crossroad: Emerging technologies and policy choices.

Authors:  Rosa Catarino; Patrick Petignat; Gabriel Dongui; Pierre Vassilakos
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

7.  Evaluation of a worksite cervical screening initiative to increase Pap smear uptake in Malaysia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fauziah Abdullah; Michael O'Rorke; Liam Murray; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Women's knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, screening, and reasons for non-participation in cervical cancer screening programme in Estonia.

Authors:  Alice Kivistik; Katrin Lang; Paolo Baili; Ahti Anttila; Piret Veerus
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 9.  Recent advances in morphological cell image analysis.

Authors:  Shengyong Chen; Mingzhu Zhao; Guang Wu; Chunyan Yao; Jianwei Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Bengt Andrae; Therese M-L Andersson; Paul C Lambert; Levent Kemetli; Lena Silfverdal; Björn Strander; Walter Ryd; Joakim Dillner; Sven Törnberg; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.