Literature DB >> 19695753

Do patient characteristics, disease, or treatment explain social inequality in survival from colorectal cancer?

Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen1, Merete Osler, Henrik Harling, Steen Ladelund, Torben Jørgensen.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the association between individually measured socioeconomic status (SES) and all-cause survival in colorectal cancer patients, and explores whether factors related to the patient, the disease, or the surgical treatment mediate the observed social gradient. The data were derived from a nationwide clinical database of all adenocarcinomas of the colon or rectum diagnosed in Denmark between 2001 and 2004 (inclusive). These data were linked to those from several central registries providing information on income, education, and housing status, as well as to data on comorbidity from previous hospitalizations and use of medication. Only patients with colorectal cancer as their first primary tumour and those born after 1920 were included. A total of 8763 patients were included in the study. Cox proportional hazard regression models revealed a positive social gradient in survival for increasing levels of education and income, and in owners versus renters of housing. A series of regression analyses were used to test potential mediators of the association between the socioeconomic indicators and survival by stepwise inclusion of lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index), comorbidity, stage of disease, mode of admission, type of operation, specialization of the surgeon, and curative versus palliative resection. A causal diagram guided the analyses. Inclusion of comorbidity, and to a lesser extent lifestyle, reduced the variation associated with SES, while no evidence of a mediating effect was found for disease or surgical treatment factors. This indicates that the difference in survival among colorectal cancer patients from different social groups was probably not caused by unintentional differences in treatment factors related to surgery, and suggests that primary prevention of chronic diseases among the socially deprived might be one way to reduce social differences in prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695753     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  25 in total

1.  Geographic variation in colorectal cancer survival and the role of small-area socioeconomic deprivation: a multilevel survival analysis of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort.

Authors:  Min Lian; Mario Schootman; Chyke A Doubeni; Yikyung Park; Jacqueline M Major; Rosalie A Torres Stone; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Albert R Hollenbeck; Barry I Graubard; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Fundamental causes of colorectal cancer mortality in the United States: understanding the importance of socioeconomic status in creating inequality in mortality.

Authors:  Nallely Saldana-Ruiz; Sean A P Clouston; Marcie S Rubin; Cynthia G Colen; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Why so late?!--delay in treatment of colorectal cancer is socially determined.

Authors:  Mike Ralf Langenbach; Stefan Sauerland; Karl-Wilhelm Kröbel; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  B L Frederiksen; T Jørgensen; K Brasso; I Holten; M Osler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Unemployment, public-sector healthcare expenditure and colorectal cancer mortality in the European Union: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Mahiben Maruthappu; Robert A Watson; Johnathan Watkins; Callum Williams; Thomas Zeltner; Omar Faiz; Raghib Ali; Rifat Atun
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nina Afshar; Dallas R English; Roger L Milne
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Socioeconomic position, treatment, and survival of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Denmark--a nationwide study.

Authors:  B L Frederiksen; S O Dalton; M Osler; M Steding-Jessen; P de Nully Brown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The transition between work, sickness absence and pension in a cohort of Danish colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathrine Carlsen; Henrik Harling; Jacob Pedersen; Karl Bang Christensen; Merete Osler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Lower treatment intensity and poorer survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who live alone.

Authors:  N Cavalli-Björkman; C Qvortrup; S Sebjørnsen; P Pfeiffer; T Wentzel-Larsen; B Glimelius; H Sorbye
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.