Literature DB >> 19695439

Mobilization of circulating vascular progenitors in cancer patients receiving external beam radiation in response to tissue injury.

David S Allan1, Scott C Morgan, Paul E Birch, Lin Yang, Michael J Halpenny, Angelo Gunanayagam, Yuhua Li, Libni Eapen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endothelial-like vascular progenitor cells (VPCs) are associated with the repair of ischemic tissue injury in several clinical settings. Because the endothelium is a principal target of radiation injury, VPCs may be important in limiting toxicity associated with radiotherapy (RT) in patients with cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 30 patients undergoing RT for skin cancer (n = 5), head-and-neck cancer (n = 15), and prostate cancer (n = 10) prospectively, representing a wide range of irradiated mucosal volumes. Vascular progenitor cell levels were enumerated from peripheral blood at baseline, midway through RT, at the end of treatment, and 4 weeks after radiation. Acute toxicity was graded at each time point by use of the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0.
RESULTS: Significant increases in the proportion of CD34(+)/CD133(+) VPCs were observed after completion of RT, from 0.012% at baseline to 0.048% (p = 0.029), and the increase in this subpopulation was most marked in patients with Grade 2 peak toxicity or greater after RT (p = 0.034). Similarly, CD34(+)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive VPCs were increased after the completion of radiation therapy in comparison to baseline (from 0.014% to 0.027%, p = 0.043), and there was a trend toward greater mobilization in patients with more significant toxicity (p = 0.08). The mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells did not increase after treatment (p = 0.58), and there was no relationship with toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that VPCs may play an important role in reducing radiation-induced tissue damage. Interventions that increase baseline VPC levels or enhance their mobilization and recruitment in response to RT may prove useful in facilitating more rapid and complete tissue healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695439     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Sorafenib induced radiation recall dermatitis after spine radiosurgery.

Authors:  Jared Robbins; Ira Wollner; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

2.  Radiotherapy suppresses angiogenesis in mice through TGF-betaRI/ALK5-dependent inhibition of endothelial cell sprouting.

Authors:  Natsuko Imaizumi; Yan Monnier; Monika Hegi; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Curzio Rüegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Whole brain radiation-induced vascular cognitive impairment: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Junie P Warrington; Nicole Ashpole; Anna Csiszar; Yong Woo Lee; Zoltan Ungvari; William E Sonntag
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 4.  Balancing efficacy of and host immune responses to cancer therapy: the yin and yang effects.

Authors:  Yuval Shaked
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Radio-detoxified LPS alters bone marrow-derived extracellular vesicles and endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hargita Hegyesi; Nikolett Sándor; Géza Sáfrány; Virág Lovas; Árpád Kovács; Angéla Takács; László Kőhidai; Lilla Turiák; Ágnes Kittel; Krisztina Pálóczi; Lóránd Bertók; Edit Irén Buzás
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.832

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.