Literature DB >> 19695387

Celecoxib in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: results from two randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover studies.

Stephen Daniels1, Jeffery Robbins, Christine R West, Mary Anne Nemeth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, has established analgesic efficacy for the treatment of acute pain resulting from a variety of causes.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes 2 studies designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib in patients with primary dysmenorrhea.
METHODS: Two identical, 3-day, multiple-dose, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover studies were carried out in women aged 18 to 44 years with primary dysmenorrhea (studies 1 and 2). The studies employed a 6-sequence, 3-period, complete-block crossover design over 3 menstrual cycles. Patients received celecoxib 400 mg, followed by celecoxib 200 mg no sooner than 12 hours after first dose (day 1), then celecoxib 200 mg q12h as necessary (days 2 and 3); naproxen sodium 550 mg followed by naproxen sodium 550 mg no sooner than 12 hours after first dose (day 1), then naproxen sodium 550 mg q12h as necessary (days 2 and 3); or placebo. Primary efficacy measures were time-weighted sum of total pain relief and time-weighted sum of pain intensity difference at 8 hours after administration of the first dose of study medication (TOTPAR[8] and SPID[8], respectively). Tolerability was assessed using routine physical examination, including vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory analyses at screening and end of study.
RESULTS: In total, 149 and 154 patients were randomized to 1 of the 6 treatment sequences in studies 1 and 2, respectively. Across treatment sequences, mean age ranges were 23.4 to 26.9 years (study 1) and 28.3 to 34.1 years (study 2). Mean weight ranges were 62.7 to 74.5 kg (study 1) and 69.2 to 86.7 kg (study 2). Most patients (96.6% in study 1, 80.5% in study 2) were white. Mean TOTPAR[8] values with celecoxib (study 1/study 2, 18.28/17.98) and naproxen sodium (20.59/21.27) were significantly greater than with placebo (12.82/12.98) (all, P < 0.001). Mean SPID[8] values were significantly greater with celecoxib (10.06/9.60) and naproxen sodium (11.48/11.71) than with placebo (5.96/6.41) (all, P < 0.001). Naproxen sodium was significantly different from celecoxib in TOTPAR[8] (study 2 only) and SPID[8] (both studies) (all, P < 0.001). In both studies, the adverse-events (AEs) profile was not significantly different between treatments, with the majority of AEs being related to primary dysmenorrhea and not medication. Less than 10% of patients experienced severe AEs in any treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS: In these 2 identically designed studies in women aged 18 to 44 years, celecoxib 400 mg (followed by 200 mg q12h) was more effective, as measured using pain scores, in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea compared with placebo. In each study, the primary efficacy measures-TOTPAR[8] and SPID[8] scores-were significantly improved with celecoxib and naproxen sodium compared with placebo. SPID[8] in both studies and TOTPAR[8] in study 2 were significantly improved with naproxen sodium compared with celecoxib. Both celecoxib and naproxen sodium were well tolerated and provided relief from menstrual pain within 1 hour of administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695387     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  12 in total

Review 1.  Dysmenorrhoea.

Authors:  Pallavi Manish Latthe; Rita Champaneria; Khalid Saeed Khan
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-02-21

Review 2.  Dysmenorrhoea.

Authors:  Pallavi Manish Latthe; Rita Champaneria
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-10-21

Review 3.  Endometriosis.

Authors:  Serdar E Bulun; Bahar D Yilmaz; Christia Sison; Kaoru Miyazaki; Lia Bernardi; Shimeng Liu; Amanda Kohlmeier; Ping Yin; Magdy Milad; JianJun Wei
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  Relief of menstrual symptoms and migraine with a single-tablet formulation of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium.

Authors:  Vincent T Martin; Jeanne Ballard; Michael P Diamond; Lisa K Mannix; Frederick J Derosier; Shelly E Lener; Alok Krishen; Susan A McDonald
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea.

Authors:  Jane Marjoribanks; Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke; Cindy Farquhar; Michelle Proctor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-30

6.  Efficacy of celecoxib for pain management after arthroscopic surgery of hip: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-13

7.  Flucrypyrim, a novel uterine relaxant, has antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in vivo.

Authors:  Zhongtang Li; Limei Wang; Yue Cong; Lin Guo; Xiaohui Lin; Zuyin Yu; Xingan Wu; Junxing Dong; Rifang Yang; Yuwen Cong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative efficacy and dysmenorrhea score of 6 object-separated moxibustions for the treatment of Chinese patients with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi-Xuan Wu; Min-Jie Cai; Pei-Dong Huang; Jia-Yun Chen; Zhao-Hui Lv; Xu-Yan Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Graphical displays for effective reporting of evidence quality tables in research syntheses.

Authors:  Luciano Mignini; Rita Champaneria; Ekaterina Mishanina; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Feng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.