Literature DB >> 19694971

Endocardial electrogram analysis after intramyocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells in the chronic ischemic myocardium.

Korff Krause1, Carsten Schneider, Claudia Lange, Bulent Kokturk, Sigrid Boczor, Stephan Geidel, Ahmed Salhi, Jusuf Alaser, Axel R Zander, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Kai Jaquet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell injection therapies have been introduced for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease. However, intramyocardial injection of bone marrow (BM)-derived cells may generate proarrhythmogenicity.
METHODS: Two weeks after the placement of a circumflex artery-ameroid constrictor, 21 pigs received mesenchymal stem cells (MSC, n = 9), mononuclear (BM)-derived stem cells (MNC, n = 6), and placebo (n = 6) using a electromechanical mapping (EMM)-guided percutaneous transendocardial injection catheter. At week 6, EMM was repeated and the injected areas were analyzed in detail to evaluate local bipolar electrogram fragmentation, duration, and amplitude. Myocardial fibrosis was evaluated by a quantitative histological analysis.
RESULTS: At week 6, the injection of MSC or MNC did not increase local electrogram fragmentation (MSC group: 1.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2; MNC group: 1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2; P = NS), prolong electrogram duration (MSC group: 27.1 +/- 7.8 ms vs. 23.7 +/- 2.0 ms; MNC group: 27.8 +/- 3.5 ms vs. 26.8 +/- 5.6 ms; P = NS), or decrease bipolar voltages (MSC group 2.7 +/- 0.9 mV vs. 2.8 +/- 1.0 mV; MNC group 2.0 +/- 1.0 mV vs. 1.7 +/- 0.4 mV). From week 2 to week 6, mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the MSC group (37.9 +/- 4.2% vs. 45.9 +/- 2.2%; P = 0.039) only. Histological analysis of the ischemic regions revealed 17.6 +/- 5% myocardial fibrosis in the MNC group vs. 13.6 +/- 3.4% MSC vs. 28.7 +/- 8.7% in the control group (P = 0.038 and P = 0.013). No death occurred in any animal after the injection procedure.
CONCLUSION: Intramyocardial injection of MSC or MNC do not increase fragmentation and duration of endocardial electrograms in the injected ischemic myocardium but attenuate ischemic damage and therefore may not create an electrophysiological substrate for reentry tachycardias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694971     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02483.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  Protein localization in the plant Golgi apparatus and the trans-Golgi network.

Authors:  C Saint-Jore-Dupas; V Gomord; N Paris
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Intracoronary delivery of mesenchymal stem cells reduces proarrhythmogenic risks in swine with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Wang; Y Jin; C Ding; F Zhang; M Chen; B Yang; Q Shan; J Zou; K Cao
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  [Surgical intramyocardial stem cell therapy for chronic ischemic heart failure].

Authors:  Alexander Kaminski; Peter Donndorf; Christian Klopsch; Gustav Steinhoff
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Bone marrow cell injection for chronic myocardial ischemia: the past and the future.

Authors:  Jan van Ramshorst; Sander F Rodrigo; Martin J Schalij; Saskia L M A Beeres; Jeroen J Bax; Douwe E Atsma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of 3D NOGA mapping in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Mariann Gyöngyösi; Nabil Dib
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Potential and clinical utility of stem cells in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Korff Krause; Carsten Schneider; Kai Jaquet; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2010-03-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.