Literature DB >> 19694532

Preoperative superselective transarterial embolization in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique, oncologic, and functional outcomes.

Giuseppe Simone1, Rocco Papalia, Salvatore Guaglianone, Ester Forestiere, Michele Gallucci.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We report the mid-term oncologic and functional results of a series of 110 patients treated with transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) after superselective arterial embolization (SEA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2003 and August 2007, 110 patients underwent LPN after SEA for T1 renal tumors. All data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Mean age of patients was 61 (range 37-80), and mean tumor size was 4.4 cm (range 2.5-6.5). Angiographic procedure was performed by a single experienced radiologist, and surgical procedure was performed by a single experienced surgeon. Perioperative data were collected and analyzed. Renal function was evaluated by preoperative and 3- and 12-month postoperative (99m)Tc diethylenetetramine pentacetic acid renal scans.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 58 minutes (range 35-220), and mean blood loss was 106 mL (range 20-800). No conversion to open surgery occurred; in one patient radical nephrectomy was necessary because of the total intraparenchymal growth of the tumor. Mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2-12). Pathologic analyses found 33 benign tumors in 31 patients and renal cell carcinoma in 79 cases (26 pT1a, 45 pT1b, 6 pT2, and 2 pT3a). At a median follow-up of 41 months, computed tomography scan revealed two local recurrences, one of which not confirmed by pathologic evaluation after radical nephrectomy. One patient died of disease 1 year after surgery. When matching preoperative and 1-year postoperative renal scan, median decrease of glomerular filtration rate was 5% (range 0%-9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SEA allows us to perform LPN without clamping hilum vessels and so without time threshold related to ischemic damage. Oncological outcome is comparable to that of open surgery, and functional results are encouraging, thanks to the optimal preservation of renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694532     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for hemostasis and renorrhaphy after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Rajan Ramanathan; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Zero-ischemia minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Rocco Papalia; Manuela Costantini; Salvatore Guaglianone; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Zero ischaemia partial nephrectomy: a call for standardized nomenclature and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Giacomo Novara; Alexander Mottrie; Salah Al-Buheissi; Omer Karim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: perioperative and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Giuseppe Simone; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Manuela Costantini; Diana Giannarelli; Carlo Ludovico Maini; Ester Forastiere; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Vincenzo Ficarra; Christian Gratzke; Jihad Kaouk; Alexander Kutikov; Veronica Macchi; Alexandre Mottrie; Francesco Porpiglia; James Porter; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; R Houston Thompson; Robert G Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  [What can/should be treated in kidney tumors and when].

Authors:  C M Sommer; D F Vollherbst; G M Richter; H U Kauczor; P L Pereira
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Riccardo Autorino; Vincenzo Altieri; Steven Campbell; Vincenzo Ficarra; Inderbir Gill; Alexander Kutikov; Alex Mottrie; Vincenzo Mirone; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 24.267

8.  A narrative review of fluorescence imaging in robotic-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Lee; Nynke S van den Berg; Ryan K Orosco; Eben L Rosenthal; Jonathan M Sorger
Journal:  Laparosc Surg       Date:  2021-07-25

9.  Diagnosis and treatment of cystic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiexiu Zhang; Bianjiang Liu; Ninghong Song; Lixin Hua; Zengjun Wang; Min Gu; Changjun Yin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Predictors of postoperative renal functional damage after nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Jun Qi; Yongjiang Yu; Tao Huang; Qiang Bai; Jian Kang; Junhao Liang; Yu Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.