Literature DB >> 19694526

Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy.

Trushar Patel1, Kristin Kozakowski, Greg Hruby, Mantu Gupta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent years several new parameters such as Hounsefield unit density and skin to stone distance (SSD) have been determined to correlate with successful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). SSD has been shown to independently predict successful SWL for lower pole calculi. The objective of this study was to determine which stone characteristics on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT), including SSD, independently predict for SWL success regardless of stone location within the kidney.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all 1282 SWL procedures between 2004 and 2007 at a single institution revealed 83 patients meeting inclusion criteria for current study. All patients were treated using a single electromagnetic lithotriptor (DoLi 50; Dornier Medical Systems, Marrieta, GA) with a single technician. Stone-free (SF) status was determined by NCCT or abdominal plain film radiographs at 6 weeks post-SWL. Logistic regression analysis was computed to assess SF rates using SSD, stone size, location, and Hounsefield unit density as predictors. RESULT: Of the 83 patients, 51 were SF and 32 had residual stones at a mean follow-up of 2.3 months. The mean SSD in the SF group was 83.3 +/- 21.9 mm in comparison to those in the residual stone group who had a mean SSD of 107.7 +/- 28.9 mm (p < or = 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SSD was the only significant independent predictor of treatment outcome.
CONCLUSION: SSD is an easily measured parameter on NCCT that independently correlates with SWL efficacy in treating stones in all locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694526     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  27 in total

1.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

Review 3.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Initial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units.

Authors:  Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Gokhan Atis; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mansur Daggulli; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Tuna Karatag; Cenk Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  J Klein; C Netsch; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; M Schoenthaler; J Rassweiler; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Feasibility and efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a new modified lateral position for the treatment of renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Anastasios Karatzas; Stavros Gravas; Vassilios Tzortzis; Evangelos Aravantinos; Ioannis Zachos; Nikolaos Kalogeras; Michael Melekos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 7.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Superobese: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Michael S Borofsky; Nadya York; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Basri Cakiroglu; S Erkan Eyyupoglu; Tuncay Tas; Mb Can Balci; Ismet Hazar; S Hilmi Aksoy; Orhun Sinanoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

10.  Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Piezolith 3000 in the management of solitary ureteral stone.

Authors:  Insang Hwang; Seung-Il Jung; Kwang Ho Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun-Ouck Kim; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.