Literature DB >> 19694337

Effects of multifaceted nurse-coaching intervention on diabetic complications and satisfaction of persons with type 2 diabetes.

Rungrawee Navicharern1, Yupin Aungsuroch, Sureeporn Thanasilp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of multifaceted nurse-coaching intervention on diabetic complications which were assessed by HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL-C levels and satisfaction with nursing intervention of persons with type 2 diabetes. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Quasi-experimental design study was conducted from October 2007 to March 2008. Forty participants with type 2 diabetes of two Red Cross Health Stations in Bangkok, Relief and Public Health Bureau of the Thai Red Cross Society, were selected by purposive sampling and matched pair The participants of the 11th Red Cross Health Station were the control group (n=20) who received the usual care while the participants of the 2nd Red Cross Health Station were the experimental group (n=20) who received the multifaceted nurse-coaching intervention over 12 weeks. A multifaceted nurse-coaching intervention was performed on a trail basis on the coaching model of Eaton and Johnson (2001). The coaching process included assessment, goal definition, analysis, exploring, action plan, learning and feedback and consisted of 3 individualized sessions and 2 follow-up phone calls over 12 weeks. The community nurses were trained to be involved in the intervention. Data from each participant were collected by using a questionnaire related to their personal demography and signs or risk factors of diabetic complications including HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-C testing, and interviewing satisfaction with nursing intervention questionnaire. The data were analyzed using dependent samples t-test, and independent sample t-test.
RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age, sex and duration of diabetic history. After 12 weeks, the mean average of HbA1c of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (x(exp) = 7.10, SD = .67 vs. x(cont) = 7.72, SD = .97; p < or = 0.5). There was no statistically significant difference in blood pressure between the experimental group and the control group (systolic blood pressure: x(exp) = 121.0, SD = 10.28 vs. x(cont) = 127.4, SD = 15.30; p > 0.5, diastolic blood pressure: x(exp) = 81.30, SD = 9.18 vs. x(con) = 79.4, SD = 19.43; p > .05). There was also no difference between the two groups in average mean of LDL-C level (x(exp) = 123.60, SD = .45.53 vs. X(cont) = 110.40, SD = 25.60; p > .05). The participants in the experimental group had significantly higher satisfaction score than the control group (x(exp) = 4.91, SD = 0.91 vs. x(cont) = 2.49, SD = 0.18; p < 0.5).
CONCLUSION: The multifaceted nurse-coaching intervention could reduce HbA1c and increase satisfaction but could not decrease blood pressure and LDL-levels in persons with type 2 diabetes who received the intervention for 12 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  9 in total

1.  Evidence based review of type 2 diabetes prevention and management in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Aimee Afable; Nidhi Shree Karingula
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-05-25

2.  Implementing a Health Coaching Curriculum in Hawaii's Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Jermy-Leigh B Domingo; Andrea L Macabeo; Mairine Kaiko-George; Denise K Ropa; Thessalonica K Sandi; Olivia A Pascual; Cori L Takesue; Diana Mv Shaw; Joseph W Humphry
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2019-06

3.  An automated telephone nutrition support system for Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Raman Khanna; Pamela J Stoddard; Elizabeth N Gonzales; Mariana Villagran-Flores; Joan Thomson; Paul Bayard; Ana Gabriela Palos Lucio; Dean Schillinger; Stefano Bertozzi; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-19

4.  "Smile healthy to your diabetes": health coaching-based intervention for oral health and diabetes management.

Authors:  Ayse Basak Cinar; Inci Oktay; Lone Schou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Measuring the quality of patients' goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool.

Authors:  Cayla R Teal; Paul Haidet; Ajay S Balasubramanyam; Elisa Rodriguez; Aanand D Naik
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  How to build and evaluate an integrated health care system for chronic patients: study design of a clustered randomised controlled trial in rural China.

Authors:  Wenxi Tang; Xiaowei Sun; Yan Zhang; Ting Ye; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Task-sharing interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction and lipid outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T N Anand; Linju M Joseph; A V Geetha; Joyita Chowdhury; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Panniyammakal Jeemon
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.766

8.  Task sharing with non-physician health-care workers for management of blood pressure in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T N Anand; Linju Maria Joseph; A V Geetha; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Panniyammakal Jeemon
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 38.927

9.  Health Economic Evaluation of Home and Hospital-Based Care in T2D Patients on Insulin Therapy.

Authors:  Ali Janati; Mohamad Ali Sarabchian; Bahram Mohaghegh; Naser Aghmohamadzadeh; Hesam Seyedin; Masumeh Gholizadeh; Edris Hasanpoor
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2017-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.