Literature DB >> 19692807

Quantitative sensory testing in measurement of neuropathic pain phenomena and other sensory abnormalities.

Miroslav-Misha Backonja1, David Walk, Robert R Edwards, Nalini Sehgal, Toby Moeller-Bertram, Ajay Wasan, Gordon Irving, Charles Argoff, Mark Wallace.   

Abstract

Neuropathic pain disorders are usually characterized by spontaneous ongoing or intermittent symptoms, stimulus-evoked positive sensory phenomena, and negative sensory phenomena. Spontaneous individual subject specific phenomena are identified in the neurologic history and are quantifiable by means of self-reported neuropathic pain symptoms tools such as scales, inventories, and questionnaires. Negative and positive sensory phenomena are assessed by the neurologic bedside examination and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which refers to psychophysical tests of sensory perception during the administration of stimuli with predetermined physical properties and following specific protocols. QST is able to capture and quantify stimulus-evoked negative and positive sensory phenomena, and as such should become standard if not a critical tool in neuropathic pain research and practice. Although the advent of anatomic and functional imaging modalities is revolutionizing our understanding of the mechanisms of neuropathic pain, only by anchoring such test results to individual subjects' own perceptions via QST can they provide meaningful information about neuropathic pain, which is based on perceptual experience. To yield useful results, QST requires a cooperative subject and carefully standardized methods, including standardization of the stimulus parameters as well as the testing environment, instructions, and evaluation methods. This manuscript provides a concise review of fundamental concepts necessary for understanding the role of QST in the process of eliciting information about sensory abnormalities associated with neuropathic pain and the place of that information in analysis of pain mechanisms. Together with the companion manuscript, this review provides definitions that should help further the use of QST as a diagnostic tool as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692807     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a68c7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  63 in total

Review 1.  Role of small-fiber afferents in pain mechanisms with implications on diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Phillip J Albrecht; Frank L Rice
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Phenotyping and genotyping neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Inna Belfer; Feng Dai
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Laboratory tools for assessing neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Giulia Di Stefano; Silvia La Cesa; Antonella Biasiotta; Caterina Leone; Alessia Pepe; Giorgio Cruccu; Andrea Truini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Predicting postoperative pain based on preoperative pain perception: are we doing better than the weatherman?

Authors:  Srinivasa N Raja; Troels S Jensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Quantitative sensory testing of neuropathic pain patients: potential mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Doreen B Pfau; Christian Geber; Frank Birklein; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

6.  Comparison between quantitative and subjective assessments of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takashi Saito; Daisuke Makiura; Junichiro Inoue; Hisayo Doi; Kimikazu Yakushijin; Atsuo Okamura; Hiroshi Matsuoka; Toru Mukohara; Ryuichi Saura; Yoshitada Sakai; Rei Ono
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-07-22

7.  A QST-based Pain Phenotype in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Sensitivity and Specificity of Quality Descriptors.

Authors:  Brenda W Dyal; Miriam O Ezenwa; Saunjoo L Yoon; Roger B Fillingim; Yingwei Yao; Judith M Schlaeger; Marie L Suarez; Zaijie J Wang; Robert E Molokie; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Clinical Interpretation of Quantitative Sensory Testing as a Measure of Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Amanda M Brandow; Julie A Panepinto
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.289

9.  Pain threshold and intensity in rheumatic patients: correlations with the Hamilton Depression Rating scale.

Authors:  Gianluca Bagnato; Ilenia De Andres; Stefania Sorbara; Elisa Verduci; Giorgio Corallo; Antonino Ferrera; Salvatore Morgante; William Neal Roberts; Gianfilippo Bagnato
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  NON-INVASIVE EVALUATION OF NERVE CONDUCTION IN SMALL DIAMETER FIBERS IN THE RAT.

Authors:  Elena G Zotova; Joseph C Arezzo
Journal:  Physiol J       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.