Literature DB >> 19692711

Categorical versus continuous risk factors and the calculation of potential impact fractions.

Jan J Barendregt1, J Lennert Veerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential impact fraction is a measure of effect that calculates the proportional change in disease risk after a change in the exposure of a related risk factor. Potential impact fractions are increasingly used to calculate attributable fractions when the lowest exposure is non-zero.
METHODS: Risk-factor exposure can be expressed as a categorical or a continuous variable. For a categorical risk factor, a change in risk-factor exposure can be expressed as a change in the proportion of the population in each category ('proportions shift'). For a continuous risk factor, the change is expressed as a change in its parameters ('distribution shift'). A third method ('RR shift') takes elements of both the categorical and the continuous approach. We compare the three calculation methods using hypothetical data on BMI and an intervention that affects the obese category.
RESULTS: The 'proportion shift' calculation produces non-linear artefacts and is best avoided. The 'RR shift' and 'distribution shift' calculation require the estimation of an RR function to describe excess risk, but perform much better.
CONCLUSION: The 'proportion shift' calculation is best avoided. The 'RR shift' and 'distribution shift' calculation produce virtually the same results. For evaluating high-risk strategies, the 'RR shift' calculation is the simplest and therefore preferred. The 'distribution shift' is best suited for evaluating population strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692711     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.090274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  52 in total

1.  Potential Impacts of Modifiable Behavioral and Environmental Exposures on Reducing Burden of Under-five Mortality Associated with Household Air Pollution in Nepal.

Authors:  Sabrina Naz; Andrew Page; Kingsley Emwinyore Agho
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-01

2.  Mortality Risk Reductions from Substituting Screen Time by Discretionary Activities.

Authors:  Katrien Wijndaele; Stephen J Sharp; Nicholas J Wareham; Søren Brage
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Gestational Weight Gain Trend and Population Attributable Risks of Adverse Fetal Growth Outcomes in Ohio.

Authors:  Aimin Chen; Fan Xu; Changchun Xie; Tianying Wu; Ann M Vuong; Maohua Miao; Wei Yuan; Emily A DeFranco
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Cancers Potentially Preventable through Excess Weight Reduction in Germany in 2010.

Authors:  Antje Wienecke; Hannelore Neuhauser; Klaus Kraywinkel; Benjamin Barnes
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  The potentially modifiable burden of incident heart failure due to obesity: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Laura R Loehr; Wayne D Rosamond; Charles Poole; Ann Marie McNeill; Patricia P Chang; Anita Deswal; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Potential cardiovascular mortality reductions with stricter food policies in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Martin O Flaherty; Gemma Flores-Mateo; Kelechi Nnoaham; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Global burden of cancer attributable to high body-mass index in 2012: a population-based study.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Nirmala Pandeya; Graham Byrnes; Prof Andrew G Renehan; Gretchen A Stevens; Prof Majid Ezzati; Jacques Ferlay; J Jaime Miranda; Isabelle Romieu; Rajesh Dikshit; David Forman; Isabelle Soerjomataram
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Impact of tobacco control policies implementation on future lung cancer incidence in Europe: An international, population-based modeling study.

Authors:  Thomas Gredner; Ute Mons; Tobias Niedermaier; Hermann Brenner; Isabelle Soerjomataram
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-05

9.  The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the morbidly obese adult population of Australia.

Authors:  Yong Yi Lee; J Lennert Veerman; Jan J Barendregt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Healthy lifestyle and the risk of pancreatic cancer in the EPIC study.

Authors:  Sabine Naudin; Vivian Viallon; Dana Hashim; Heinz Freisling; Mazda Jenab; Elisabete Weiderpass; Flavie Perrier; Fiona McKenzie; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Christina C Dahm; Kim Overvad; Francesca R Mancini; Vinciane Rebours; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Verena Katzke; Rudolf Kaaks; Manuela Bergmann; Heiner Boeing; Eleni Peppa; Anna Karakatsani; Antonia Trichopoulou; Valeria Pala; Giovana Masala; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Anne M May; Carla H van Gils; Charlotta Rylander; Kristin Benjaminsen Borch; María Dolores Chirlaque López; Maria-Jose Sánchez; Eva Ardanaz; José Ramón Quirós; Pilar Amiano Exezarreta; Malin Sund; Isabel Drake; Sara Regnér; Ruth C Travis; Nick Wareham; Dagfinn Aune; Elio Riboli; Marc J Gunter; Eric J Duell; Paul Brennan; Pietro Ferrari
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.