Literature DB >> 19692511

Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Til Ole Bergmann1, Sergiu Groppa, Markus Seeger, Matthias Mölle, Lisa Marshall, Hartwig Roman Siebner.   

Abstract

Transcranial oscillatory current stimulation has recently emerged as a noninvasive technique that can interact with ongoing endogenous rhythms of the human brain. Yet, there is still little knowledge on how time-varied exogenous currents acutely modulate cortical excitability. In ten healthy individuals we used on-line single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to search for systematic shifts in corticospinal excitability during anodal sleeplike 0.8-Hz slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS). In separate sessions, we repeatedly applied 30-s trials (two blocks at 20 min) of either anodal so-tDCS or constant tDCS (c-tDCS) to the primary motor hand area during quiet wakefulness. Simultaneously and time-locked to different phase angles of the slow oscillation, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as an index of corticospinal excitability were obtained in the contralateral hand muscles 10, 20, and 30 s after the onset of tDCS. MEPs were also measured off-line before, between, and after both stimulation blocks to detect any lasting excitability shifts. Both tDCS modes increased MEP amplitudes during stimulation with an attenuation of the facilitatory effect toward the end of a 30-s tDCS trial. No phase-locking of corticospinal excitability to the exogenous oscillation was observed during so-tDCS. Off-line TMS revealed that both c-tDCS and so-tDCS resulted in a lasting excitability increase. The individual magnitude of MEP facilitation during the first tDCS trials predicted the lasting MEP facilitation found after tDCS. We conclude that sleep slow oscillation-like excitability changes cannot be actively imposed on the awake cortex with so-tDCS, but phase-independent on-line as well as off-line facilitation can reliably be induced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692511     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00437.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Rippling the cortex with high-frequency (>100 Hz) alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Both sleep and wakefulness support consolidation of continuous, goal-directed, visuomotor skill.

Authors:  Michael R Borich; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intracortical Dynamics Underlying Repetitive Stimulation Predicts Changes in Network Connectivity.

Authors:  Yuhao Huang; Boglárka Hajnal; László Entz; Dániel Fabó; Jose L Herrero; Ashesh D Mehta; Corey J Keller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Rhythmic modulation of thalamic oscillations depends on intrinsic cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Guoshi Li; Craig S Henriquez; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the intact corticospinal system after unilateral injury restores skilled locomotor control and promotes spinal axon outgrowth.

Authors:  Jason B Carmel; Lauren J Berrol; Marcel Brus-Ramer; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  About sleep's role in memory.

Authors:  Björn Rasch; Jan Born
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 7.  Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Til Ole Bergmann; Flavio Fröhlich; Surjo R Soekadar; John-Stuart Brittain; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Alexander T Sack; Carlo Miniussi; Andrea Antal; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Ulf Ziemann; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Low-frequency stimulation enhances ensemble co-firing and dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  Preeya Khanna; Douglas Totten; Lisa Novik; Jeffrey Roberts; Robert J Morecraft; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes.

Authors:  Christoph S Herrmann; Stefan Rach; Toralf Neuling; Daniel Strüber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states.

Authors:  Toralf Neuling; Stefan Rach; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.