Literature DB >> 19691990

Can interval appendectomy be justified following conservative treatment of perforated acute appendicitis?

Joannele Z Lugo1, Dimitrios V Avgerinos, Amanda J Lefkowitz, Matthew E Seigerman, Ismail S Zahir, Andrew Y Lo, Burton Surick, I Michael Leitman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There continues to be controversy about the necessity of interval appendectomy for delayed presentation of acute appendicitis. While recent studies suggest that the risk of recurrent disease is small, the risk of interval appendectomy is also small and does provide histologic identification and usually definitive treatment of the right lower quadrant inflammatory process.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records gathered from 2002 to 2007 at a major teaching hospital of 986 adult patients over the age of 13 with appendicitis were analyzed. Forty-six patients (5%) were found to have right lower quadrant abscess or phlegmon, and were managed with intravenous antibiotics. Some patients also underwent percutaneous drainage. These patients were then readmitted 6 to 26 wk later for an elective laparoscopic interval appendectomy.
RESULTS: There were 19 males and 27 females with an average age of 43 y. Ninety-four percent of the appendectomies were completed laparoscopically; 16% of patients were found to have a normal or obliterated appendix on pathologic evaluation and likely did not benefit from interval appendectomy. On the other hand, 84% of patients had persistent acute appendicitis, chronic appendicitis, evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, or neoplasm identified, and likely benefited from surgical appendectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Interval appendectomy provides diagnostic and therapeutic benefit to patients who present with a right lower quadrant abdominal inflammatory focus, and should be carefully considered in all adult patients.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691990     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  Interval routine appendectomy following conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: Is it really needed.

Authors:  George H Sakorafas; Dimitrios Sabanis; Christos Lappas; Aikaterini Mastoraki; John Papanikolaou; Charalambos Siristatidis; Vasileios Smyrniotis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-27

2.  Inflammatory appendix mass in patients with acute appendicitis: CT diagnosis and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M Martin; J Lubrano; A Azizi; B Paquette; N Badet; E Delabrousse
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-07-20

3.  Delayed appendectomy versus early appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chang Sik Shin; Young Nam Roh; Jae Il Kim
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial nonoperative management versus emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Kiyoaki Sugiura; Keiichi Suzuki; Tomoshige Umeyama; Kenshi Omagari; Takeo Hashimoto; Akihiko Tamura
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil?

Authors:  Benjamin Quartey
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-07

6.  Clinical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Shoichiro Urabe; Satoshi Hyuga; Tomo Nakagawa; Toshiya Michiura; Nobuyasu Hayashi; Kazuo Yamabe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.