Literature DB >> 19691764

Long-term prognosis of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Masanobu Kageoka1, Fumitoshi Watanabe, Yasuhiko Maruyama, Ken Nagata, Akihiko Ohata, Yuji Noda, Ichita Miwa, Kentarou Ikeya.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the present study were to clarify the long-term prognosis of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for choledocholithiasis and to evaluate the need for cholecystectomy after EST.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 2007, 262 patients who underwent successful EST for choledocholithiasis were followed up for more than 6 months). Eighteen patients had previously undergone cholecystectomy (Group A), 129 had a calculous gallbladder (GB) and underwent cholecystectomy after EST (Group B), 46 had a calculous GB in situ (Group C), and 69 had an acalculous GB in situ (Group D). Late complications, including recurrence of choledocholithiasis, acute cholecystitis and biliary carcinoma, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 262 patients, late complications occurred in 34 patients (13.0%) and recurrence of choledocholithiasis occurred in 29 patients (11.1%). The rate of late complications was higher in Group C (23.9%) than in Group B (7.8%) (P < 0.001). The rate of recurrent choledocholithiasis was higher in Group C (17.4%) than in Group B (7.8%) (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that pneumobilia after EST was associated with the recurrence of choledocholithiasis (P < 0.001). Acute cholecystitis occurred in eight (7.0%) of 115 patients with intact GB. A gallbladder carcinoma was found after EST. Late complications were not serious and endoscopically or surgically manageable.
CONCLUSIONS: EST for choledocholithiasis is safe and effective. Cholecystectomy after EST is recommended in patients with calculous GB, but is not necessary in patients with acalculous GB. Pneumobilia was associated with the recurrence of choledocholithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691764     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00880.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  10 in total

1.  Is cholecystectomy necessary after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in patients older than 80 years of age?

Authors:  Takaharu Yasui; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Kono; Yosuke Nagayoshi; Yasuhisa Mori; Kosuke Tsutsumi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Prognostic Factors and Postoperative Recurrence of Calculus Following Small-Incision Sphincterotomy with Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Intractable Choledocholithiasis: A 72-Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Hailian Mu; Jianfei Gao; Qingyin Kong; Kaitong Jiang; Cuiyue Wang; Aihua Wang; Xianzhong Zeng; Yanqing Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Shinpei Doi; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Takahiro Yamauchi; Masanori Nakashima; Seiji Adachi; Masahito Shimizu; Eiichi Tomita; Takao Itoi; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients.

Authors:  Mei Lan Cui; Joon Hyun Cho; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Comparative quality of life study between endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical choledochotomy.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Xue Bai; Guang-Feng Duan; Wen-Hua Tian; Zhao-Shen Li; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A nationwide population-based study of common bile duct stone recurrence after endoscopic stone removal in Korea.

Authors:  Byung Kyu Park; Jeong Hun Seo; Han Ho Jeon; Jong Won Choi; Sun Young Won; Yong Suk Cho; Chun Kyon Lee; Haeyong Park; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Management of complicated gallstones in the elderly: comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Yousef Nassar; Seth Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-01-08

9.  Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy vs open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Zhou; Qiao-Feng Chen; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Ming-Ju Yu; Chang Zhong; Zhi-Jian Liu; Guo-Hua Li; Xiao-Jiang Zhou; Jun-Bo Hong; You-Xiang Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Risk assessment of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its management options.

Authors:  Ausra Aleknaite; Gintaras Simutis; Juozas Stanaitis; Jonas Valantinas; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.