Literature DB >> 19691433

A self-organizing model for task allocation via frequent task quitting and random walks in the honeybee.

Brian R Johnson1.   

Abstract

Social insect colonies are able to quickly redistribute their thousands of workers between tasks that vary strongly in space and time. How individuals collectively track spatial variability is particularly puzzling because bees have access only to local information. This work presents and tests a model showing how honeybees solve their fundamental within-nest spatial task-allocation problem. The algorithm, which is self-organizing and derived from empirical studies, couples two processes with opposing effects. Frequent task quitting, followed by patrols, during which bees are insensitive to task stimuli, serves to randomize individual location throughout the nest without reference to variation in task demand, while a foraging-for-work-like mechanism provides the opposing force of localizing individuals to areas of high task demand. This simple model is shown to generate sophisticated patterns of task allocation. It allocates bees to tasks in proportion to their demand, independent of their spatial distribution in the nest, and also reallocates labor in response to temporal changes in task demand. Finally, the model shows that task-allocation patterns at the colony level do not reflect colonies allocating particular individuals to tasks. In contrast, they reflect a dynamic equilibrium of workers switching between tasks and locations in the nest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691433     DOI: 10.1086/605373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Modeling the Adaptive Role of Negative Signaling in Honey Bee Intraspecific Competition.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson; James C Nieh
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 1.309

2.  Task switching is associated with temporal delays in Temnothorax rugatulus ants.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton; Daniel Charbonneau; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee.

Authors:  B R Johnson
Journal:  Insectes Soc       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.643

4.  Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A Consensus-Based Grouping Algorithm for Multi-agent Cooperative Task Allocation with Complex Requirements.

Authors:  Simon Hunt; Qinggang Meng; Chris Hinde; Tingwen Huang
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.418

6.  Implications of behavioral architecture for the evolution of self-organized division of labor.

Authors:  A Duarte; E Scholtens; F J Weissing
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Effects of honeybee (Apis cerana) visiting behaviour on toxic plant (Tripterygium hypoglaucum) reproduction.

Authors:  Shunan Chen; Yunfei Wang; Yi Li; Xuewen Zhang; Jie Wu
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Worker personality and its association with spatially structured division of labor.

Authors:  Tobias Pamminger; Susanne Foitzik; Katharina C Kaufmann; Natalie Schützler; Florian Menzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sting, Carry and Stock: How Corpse Availability Can Regulate De-Centralized Task Allocation in a Ponerine Ant Colony.

Authors:  Thomas Schmickl; Istvan Karsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.