Literature DB >> 19691020

Efficient interval estimation of a ratio of marginal probabilities in matched-pair data: non-iterative method.

Jun-Mo Nam1.   

Abstract

Matched-pair designs have been commonly employed in diagnostic, epidemiologic and laboratory studies. For estimation of a ratio of two marginal probabilities in matched-pair data, a Wald-type logarithmic method is computationally simple, but an actual coverage rate is known to be smaller than a nominal one and a length of the confidence interval is shorter than it should be. The Fieller-type method based on constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimators possesses asymptotically optimum statistical properties and a coverage rate is close to a nominal one. However, hitherto the limits have been obtained by numerical iterations. In this paper, we derive the efficient confidence limits based on CML as analytical solutions of a quartic equation and present the confidence limits in a closed form. Published in 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691020      PMCID: PMC2785096          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of the ratio of marginal probabilities in a matched-pair setting.

Authors:  Jun-mo Nam; William C Blackwelder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data.

Authors:  Douglas G Bonett; Robert M Price
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comments on 'Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data' by D. G. Bonett and R. M. Price, Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3039-3047.

Authors:  Robert G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comments on 'Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data'.

Authors:  Jun-mo Nam
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessing screening tests: extensions of McNemar's test.

Authors:  P A Lachenbruch; C J Lynch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Approximate interval estimation of the ratio of binomial parameters: a review and corrections for skewness.

Authors:  J J Gart; J Nam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Confidence limits to the risk ratio.

Authors:  B J Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluation of vaginal infections in adolescent women: can it be done without a speculum?

Authors:  D R Blake; A Duggan; T Quinn; J Zenilman; A Joffe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Confidence Intervals for Relative Risk of Two Correlated Proportions.

Authors:  Natalie DelRocco; Yipeng Wang; Dongyuan Wu; Yuting Yang; Guogen Shan
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2022-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.