BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of endometriosis currently requires a laparoscopy and this need probably contributes to the considerable average delay in diagnosis. We have reported the presence of nerve fibres in the functional layer of endometrium in women with endometriosis, which could be used as a diagnostic test. Our aim was to assess efficacy of nerve fibre detection in endometrial biopsy for making a diagnosis of endometriosis in a double-blind comparison with expert diagnostic laparoscopy. METHODS: Endometrial biopsies, with immunohistochemical nerve fibre detection using protein gene product 9.5 as marker, taken from 99 consecutive women presenting with pelvic pain and/or infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy by experienced gynaecologic laparoscopists, were compared with surgical diagnosis. RESULTS: In women with laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 64) the mean nerve fibre density in the functional layer of the endometrial biopsy was 2.7 nerve fibres per mm(2) (+/-3.5 SD). Only one woman with endometriosis had no detectable nerve fibres. Six women had endometrial nerve fibres but no active endometriosis seen at laparoscopy. The specificity and sensitivity were 83 and 98%, respectively, positive predictive value was 91% and negative predictive value was 96%. Nerve fibre density did not differ between different menstrual cycle phases. Women with endometriosis and pain symptoms had significantly higher nerve fibre density in comparison with women with infertility but no pain (2.3 and 0.8 nerve fibre per mm(2), respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial biopsy, with detection of nerve fibres, provided a reliability of diagnosis of endometriosis which is close to the accuracy of laparoscopic assessment by experienced gynaecological laparoscopists. This study was registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTR) 00082242 (registered: 12/12/2007). The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone) of the Sydney South West Area Health Service (Protocol number X05-0345) and The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No. 10761) and all women gave their informed consent for participation.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of endometriosis currently requires a laparoscopy and this need probably contributes to the considerable average delay in diagnosis. We have reported the presence of nerve fibres in the functional layer of endometrium in women with endometriosis, which could be used as a diagnostic test. Our aim was to assess efficacy of nerve fibre detection in endometrial biopsy for making a diagnosis of endometriosis in a double-blind comparison with expert diagnostic laparoscopy. METHODS: Endometrial biopsies, with immunohistochemical nerve fibre detection using protein gene product 9.5 as marker, taken from 99 consecutive women presenting with pelvic pain and/or infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy by experienced gynaecologic laparoscopists, were compared with surgical diagnosis. RESULTS: In women with laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 64) the mean nerve fibre density in the functional layer of the endometrial biopsy was 2.7 nerve fibres per mm(2) (+/-3.5 SD). Only one woman with endometriosis had no detectable nerve fibres. Six women had endometrial nerve fibres but no active endometriosis seen at laparoscopy. The specificity and sensitivity were 83 and 98%, respectively, positive predictive value was 91% and negative predictive value was 96%. Nerve fibre density did not differ between different menstrual cycle phases. Women with endometriosis and pain symptoms had significantly higher nerve fibre density in comparison with women with infertility but no pain (2.3 and 0.8 nerve fibre per mm(2), respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial biopsy, with detection of nerve fibres, provided a reliability of diagnosis of endometriosis which is close to the accuracy of laparoscopic assessment by experienced gynaecological laparoscopists. This study was registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTR) 00082242 (registered: 12/12/2007). The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone) of the Sydney South West Area Health Service (Protocol number X05-0345) and The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No. 10761) and all women gave their informed consent for participation.
Authors: Aimee S Browne; Jie Yu; Ruo-Pan Huang; Antônio M C Francisco; Neil Sidell; Robert N Taylor Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Stacy L McAllister; Barbra K Giourgas; Elizabeth K Faircloth; Emma Leishman; Heather B Bradshaw; Eric R Gross Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Peter A W Rogers; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Asgerally Fazleabas; Linda C Giudice; Grant W Montgomery; Felice Petraglia; Robert N Taylor Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Devashana Gupta; M Louise Hull; Ian Fraser; Laura Miller; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Neil Johnson; Vicki Nisenblat Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-04-20