Literature DB >> 19690256

The practice of and documentation on withholding and withdrawing life support: a retrospective study in two Dutch intensive care units.

Peter E Spronk1, Alexej V Kuiper, Johannes H Rommes, Joke C Korevaar, Marcus J Schultz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We determined how often life support was withheld or withdrawn in patients who died in the intensive care unit (ICU) or early after ICU discharge and evaluated documentation on decisions regarding these changes in life support orders.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study in a university hospital and a general teaching hospital. Charts of patients who died during ICU stay or within 7 days after ICU discharge in 2005 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of 2578 admitted patients, 356 patients (14%) died either in the ICU or within 7 days after ICU discharge. For 9 patients data were missing, leaving 347 patients for analysis. Seventy-seven patients (22%) died with full life support, 85 (25%) died while treatment was being withheld, and 185 (53%) patients died while treatment was being withdrawn. One or more changes in life support orders were noted in 266 patients (77%). Only 8% of the patients were recorded to be incapacitated at the time of the change. Patients' preferences regarding life support were documented in less than one-quarter of cases. In approximately one third of cases, it was not documented which member(s) of the ICU team were involved in an end-of-life decision. In the documented cases, end-of-life decisions were made along with the patient (7%) or with the patient's representatives (59%).
CONCLUSION: ICU nonsurvivors and patients who die shortly after ICU discharge predominantly die with orders to withhold or withdraw life support. Documentation on the decisions to forgo full life support is poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19690256     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181acc64a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

Review 1.  Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  N M Mark; S G Rayner; N J Lee; J R Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Inter-Rater Agreement of Intensivists Evaluating the Goal Concordance of Preference-Sensitive ICU Interventions.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Sarina K Sahetya; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Josephine Kweku; Roozbeh Nikooie; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a mixed intensive care unit: most common in patients with catastropic brain injury.

Authors:  Martijn A Verkade; Jelle L Epker; Mariska D Nieuwenhoff; Jan Bakker; Erwin J O Kompanje
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Knowing when to stop: futility in the ICU.

Authors:  Dominic J C Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  A costly separation between withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Côte; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; Damon C Scales; Francis Bernard; Ryan Zarychanski; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; David Zygun; Jean-François Simard; Amélie Boutin; Jacques G Brochu; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Documentation of best interest by intensivists: a retrospective study in an Ontario critical care unit.

Authors:  Mohana Ratnapalan; Andrew B Cooper; Damon C Scales; Ruxandra Pinto
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  [End-of life decisions in intensive care units. Influence of patient wishes on therapeutic decision making].

Authors:  R Riessen; C Bantlin; U Wiesing; M Haap
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Ur Rahman Masood; Abuhasna Said; Chedid Faris; Mousab Al Mussady; Amer Al Jundi
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2013-07

10.  Managing end-of-life decision making in intensive care medicine--a perspective from Charité Hospital, Germany.

Authors:  Jan A Graw; Claudia D Spies; Klaus-D Wernecke; Jan-Peter Braun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.