Literature DB >> 19690178

Birth weight-breast cancer revisited: is the association confounded by familial factors?

Sara Oberg1, Sven Cnattingius, Sven Sandin, Paul Lichtenstein, Anastasia Iliadou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate whether the association between birth weight and the risk of breast cancer can be confounded by familial factors, such as shared environment and common genes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible were all female like-sexed twins of the Swedish Twin Registry, born during the period 1926-1958 and alive in 1973. Data were obtained from birth records, and the final study population with reliable birth weight data was made up of 11,923 twins. Hazard ratios (HR) for breast cancer according to birth weight were estimated through Cox regression, using robust SE to account for the dependence within twin pairs. Paired analysis was done to account for potential confounding by familial factors.
RESULTS: In the cohort analysis, a birth weight >or=3,000 g was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer diagnosed at or before 50 years [adjusted HR, 1.57; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.03-2.42] but not with breast cancer with a later onset (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57-1.12). From >or=2,500 g, a 500-g increase in birth weight conferred a HR of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.16-2.27) for breast cancer diagnosed at or before 50 years. This risk remained in analysis within twin pairs (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.00-2.48).
CONCLUSION: In the present study, findings indicate that the association between birth weight and breast cancer risk, seen only in women diagnosed early (<or=50 years), is not confounded by familial factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19690178     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  7 in total

1.  Perinatal characteristics and breast cancer risk in daughters: a Scandinavian population-based study.

Authors:  R Troisi; T Grotmol; J Jacobsen; S Tretli; H T Sørensen; M Gissler; R Kaaja; N Potischman; A Ekbom; R N Hoover; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Advancing research on endocrine disrupting chemicals in breast cancer: Expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Susan L Teitelbaum; Fiorella Belpoggi; Les Reinlib
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Racial variation in umbilical cord blood sex steroid hormones and the insulin-like growth factor axis in African-American and white female neonates.

Authors:  Tanya Agurs-Collins; Sabine Rohrmann; Catherine Sutcliffe; Jessica L Bienstock; Deborah Monsegue; Folasade Akereyeni; Gary Bradwin; Nader Rifai; Michael N Pollak; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Identifying opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence: puberty as a window of susceptibility.

Authors:  Frank M Biro; Julianna Deardorff
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Does the association of education with breast cancer replicate within twin pairs? A register-based study on Danish female twins.

Authors:  M Madsen; P K Andersen; M Gerster; A-M Nybo Andersen; K Christensen; M Osler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The emergence of human-evolutionary medical genomics.

Authors:  Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Zorana J Andersen; Jennifer L Baker; Kristine Bihrmann; Ilse Vejborg; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.