Literature DB >> 19689115

Effect of chemical modifications on peptide fragmentation behavior upon electron transfer induced dissociation.

Marco L Hennrich1, Paul J Boersema, Henk van den Toorn, Nikolai Mischerikow, Albert J R Heck, Shabaz Mohammed.   

Abstract

In proteomics, proteolytic peptides are often chemically modified to improve MS analysis, peptide identification, and/or to enable protein/peptide quantification. It is known that such chemical modifications can alter peptide fragmentation in collision induced dissociation MS/MS. Here, we investigated the fragmentation behavior of such chemically modified peptides in MS/MS using the relatively new activation method electron transfer dissociation (ETD). We generated proteolytic peptides using the proteases Lys-N and trypsin and compared the fragmentation behavior of the unlabeled peptides with that of their chemically modified cognates. We investigated the effect of several commonly used modification reactions, namely, guanidination, dimethylation, imidazolinylation, and nicotinylation (ICPL). Of these guanidination and imidazolinylation specifically target the epsilon-amino groups of lysine residues in the peptides, whereas dimethylation and nicotinylation modify both N-termini and epsilon-amino groups of lysine residues. Dimethylation, guanidination, and particularly imidazolinylation of doubly charged Lys-N peptides resulted in a significant increase in peptide sequence coverage, resulting in more reliable peptide identification using ETD. This may be rationalized by the increased basicity and resulting positive charge at the N-termini of these peptides. Nicotinylation of the peptides, on the other hand, severely suppressed backbone fragmentation, hampering the use of this label in ETD based analysis. Doubly charged C-terminal lysine containing tryptic peptides also resulted in an enhanced observation of a single type of fragment ion series when guanidinated or imidazolinylated. These labels would thus facilitate the use of de novo sequencing strategies based on ETD for both arginine and lysine containing tryptic peptides. Since isotopic analogues of the labeling reagents applied in this work are commercially available, one can combine quantitation with improved ETD based peptide sequencing for both Lys-N and trypsin digested samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19689115     DOI: 10.1021/ac901108g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  16 in total

1.  Database independent proteomics analysis of the ostrich and human proteome.

Authors:  A F Maarten Altelaar; Danny Navarro; Jos Boekhorst; Bas van Breukelen; Berend Snel; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparative assessment of site assignments in CID and electron transfer dissociation spectra of phosphopeptides discloses limited relocation of phosphate groups.

Authors:  Nikolai Mischerikow; A F Maarten Altelaar; J Daniel Navarro; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Sulfonium ion derivatization, isobaric stable isotope labeling and data dependent CID- and ETD-MS/MS for enhanced phosphopeptide quantitation, identification and phosphorylation site characterization.

Authors:  Yali Lu; Xiao Zhou; Paul M Stemmer; Gavin E Reid
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Tunable charge tags for electron-based methods of peptide sequencing: design and applications.

Authors:  Magdalena Zimnicka; Christopher L Moss; Thomas W Chung; Renjie Hui; František Tureček
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Investigation of the Mechanism of Electron Capture and Electron Transfer Dissociation of Peptides with a Covalently Attached Free Radical Hydrogen Atom Scavenger.

Authors:  Chang Ho Sohn; Sheng Yin; Ivory Peng; Joseph A Loo; J L Beauchamp
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Combinatorial Labeling Method for Improving Peptide Fragmentation in Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Bhanuramanand Kuchibhotla; Sankara Rao Kola; Jagannadham V Medicherla; Swamy V Cherukuvada; Vishnu M Dhople; Madhusudhana Rao Nalam
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Integrating Lys-N proteolysis and N-terminal guanidination for improved fragmentation and relative quantification of singly-charged ions.

Authors:  Valerie J Carabetta; Tuo Li; Anisha Shakya; Todd M Greco; Ileana M Cristea
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Dimethyl isotope labeling assisted de novo peptide sequencing.

Authors:  Marco L Hennrich; Shabaz Mohammed; A F Maarten Altelaar; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Impact of Amidination on Peptide Fragmentation and Identification in Shotgun Proteomics.

Authors:  Sujun Li; Aditi Dabir; Santosh A Misal; Haixu Tang; Predrag Radivojac; James P Reilly
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Chemical derivatization of peptide carboxyl groups for highly efficient electron transfer dissociation.

Authors:  Brian L Frey; Daniel T Ladror; Samuel B Sondalle; Casey J Krusemark; April L Jue; Joshua J Coon; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.