BACKGROUND: Although cancer survivors are at increased risk for developing cancers at other sites, little is known about the current status of second cancer (cancers other than the index cancer) screening practices and related factors in cervical cancer survivors. METHODS: We enrolled 809 cervical cancer survivors aged >or=40 years who had been treated at six hospitals from 1983 to 2004. Subjects filled out a questionnaire that included the practices of second cancer screening (breast, stomach, and colorectum) and other sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Among subjects, 38.9% had been recommended to receive screening for other cancers from health care providers, and 27.4% reported that they thought they had lower risk of other cancer than general population. Older (age >or=65 years) and poor (family income <1,000$/month) subjects were less likely to have second cancer screening. Those to whom health care providers had recommended screening for other cancers (aOR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.54-2.98), and those who had an appropriate perception of second cancer risk (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11-2.43) were more likely to undergo breast cancer screening. CONCLUSION: Lack of a recommendation for second cancer screening from health care providers and the misperception of second cancer risk might have negative impacts on the breast cancer screening behaviors in cervical cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND: Although cancer survivors are at increased risk for developing cancers at other sites, little is known about the current status of second cancer (cancers other than the index cancer) screening practices and related factors in cervical cancer survivors. METHODS: We enrolled 809 cervical cancer survivors aged >or=40 years who had been treated at six hospitals from 1983 to 2004. Subjects filled out a questionnaire that included the practices of second cancer screening (breast, stomach, and colorectum) and other sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Among subjects, 38.9% had been recommended to receive screening for other cancers from health care providers, and 27.4% reported that they thought they had lower risk of other cancer than general population. Older (age >or=65 years) and poor (family income <1,000$/month) subjects were less likely to have second cancer screening. Those to whom health care providers had recommended screening for other cancers (aOR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.54-2.98), and those who had an appropriate perception of second cancer risk (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11-2.43) were more likely to undergo breast cancer screening. CONCLUSION: Lack of a recommendation for second cancer screening from health care providers and the misperception of second cancer risk might have negative impacts on the breast cancer screening behaviors in cervical cancer survivors.
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Rahim Moineddin; Nadia Gunraj; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; David C Hodgson; Janice S Kwon; Laurie Elit Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Judith Lee Smith; Julia H Rowland; Laura P Forsythe; Loria Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sang Min Park; Jongmog Lee; Young Ae Kim; Yoon Jung Chang; Moon Soo Kim; Young Mog Shim; Jae Ill Zo; Young Ho Yun Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 4.430