Literature DB >> 19687799

Developing evidence-based process maps for spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

C Goodwin-Wilson1, M Watkins, C Gardner-Elahi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal audit.
OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based maps of rehabilitation for different lesion categories.
SETTING: Midlands, UK.
METHODS: Over a 5-year period data for all newly injured neurologically damaged patients aged 18 years or more were collected and analyzed (n=280). Data were collected from a functional independence measure (the Needs Assessment Checklist), patient records (paper and electronic) and patient goal planning records. The patients were grouped into different lesion categories. Standard milestones that patients in a given category would be expected to reach in rehabilitation were identified using goals set at goal planning meetings. Time when patients reached these milestones and variation between patients around time in reaching these milestones were calculated.
RESULTS: Median times from onset to admission, onset to rehabilitation and length of rehabilitation are given. Pictorial representations of rehabilitation (rehabilitation maps) were produced, using goals identified, median times of achievement and variation. This paper provides examples of these maps from one particular group, T8-T12 Frankel A.
CONCLUSION: Pathways of care can be used in a number of ways: to identify the need for service change; to audit service change; to provide evidence-based expectations for staff, patients and external parties; to look at variances affecting care; to make this service transparent; to provide figures for comparison with other philosophies of care; and to ensure consistency across the service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687799     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  7 in total

1.  The value of the whole picture: rehabilitation outcome measurement using patient self-report and clinician-based assessments after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Rebecca Eaton; Jane Duff; Martha Wallace; Kevin Jones
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Building and Sustaining Inpatient-Clinician Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Case Example Using the Stoke Mandeville Spinal Needs Assessment Checklist (SMS-NAC) and Goal Planning Programme.

Authors:  Jane Duff; Lucy C Grant; Helena Gilchrist; Kevin Jones
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Pharmacologic and Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Ajay X Thomas; James J Riviello; Daniel Davila-Williams; Sruthi P Thomas; Jennifer C Erklauer; David F Bauer; Jon A Cokley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.972

4.  Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Ben Goss; Susan Urquhart; Sridhar Atresh; Richard P Williams; Michael Schuetz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2011-12

5.  Challenges and potential improvements in the admission process of patients with spinal cord injury in a specialized rehabilitation clinic - an interview based qualitative study of an interdisciplinary team.

Authors:  Fabian Röthlisberger; Stefan Boes; Sara Rubinelli; Klaus Schmitt; Anke Scheel-Sailer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Grazia Antonacci; Laura Lennox; James Barlow; Liz Evans; Julie Reed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Prognostic Factors for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Hideaki Nakajima; Noriaki Yokogawa; Takeshi Sasagawa; Kei Ando; Naoki Segi; Kota Watanabe; Satoshi Nori; Shuji Watanabe; Kazuya Honjoh; Toru Funayama; Fumihiko Eto; Yoshinori Terashima; Ryosuke Hirota; Takeo Furuya; Tomohiro Yamada; Gen Inoue; Takashi Kaito; Satoshi Kato
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.869

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.