Literature DB >> 19687758

Does the presence of psychosocial "yellow flags" alter patient-provider communication for work-related, acute low back pain?

William S Shaw1, Glenn Pransky, Thomas Winters, Torill H Tveito, Susan M Larson, Debra L Roter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patterns of patient-provider communication might vary depending on psychosocial risk factors for back disability.
METHODS: Working adults (N = 97; 64% men; median age = 38 years) with work-related low back pain completed a risk factor questionnaire and then agreed to have provider visits audiotaped. Verbal exchanges were divided into utterances and coded for content, then compared among low-, medium-, and high-risk patients.
RESULTS: Among high-risk patients only, providers asked more biomedical questions, patients provided more biomedical information, and providers used more language to engage patients and facilitate communication. There were no group differences in psychosocial exchanges.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may recognize the need for more detailed assessment of patients with multiple psychosocial factors, but increases in communication are focused on medical explanations and therapeutic regimen, not on lifestyle and psychosocial factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687758     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b2f539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  6 in total

1.  What circumstances prompt a workplace discussion in medical evaluations for back pain?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Edward H Chin; Candace C Nelson; Silje Endresen Reme; Mary J Woiszwillo; Santosh K Verma
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

2.  Correspondence of patient word choice with psychologic factors in patients with upper extremity illness.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; James H Herndon; David C Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The correlation of phrases and feelings with disability.

Authors:  Pim A D van Dijk; Arjan G J Bot; Valentin Neuhaus; Chaitanya S Mudgal; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Christine Cedraschi; Margareta Nordin; Scott Haldeman; Kristi Randhawa; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Claire D Johnson; Roger Chou; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Non-specific mechanisms in orthodox and CAM management of low back pain (MOCAM): theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine Bradbury; Miznah Al-Abbadey; Dawn Carnes; Borislav D Dimitrov; Susan Eardley; Carol Fawkes; Jo Foster; Maddy Greville-Harris; J Matthew Harvey; Janine Leach; George Lewith; Hugh MacPherson; Lisa Roberts; Laura Parry; Lucy Yardley; Felicity L Bishop
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  "Blue flags", development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care.

Authors:  Charlotte Post Sennehed; Gunvor Gard; Sara Holmberg; Kjerstin Stigmar; Malin Forsbrand; Birgitta Grahn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.