Literature DB >> 19687021

A cross-sectional study among detergent workers exposed to liquid detergent enzymes.

F G B G J van Rooy1, R Houba, N Palmen, M M Zengeni, I Sander, J Spithoven, J M Rooyackers, D J J Heederik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate sensitisation and respiratory health among workers who produce liquid detergent products and handle liquid detergent enzymes.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study among 109 eligible workers of a detergent products plant. 108 were interviewed for respiratory and allergic symptoms and 106 blood samples were taken from them to examine sensitisation to enzymes. Those sensitised to > or = 1 enzymes were referred for clinical evaluation. Workers and representatives were interviewed to characterise exposure qualitatively and estimate exposure semi-quantitatively. Workers were classified into three exposure groups with varying exposure profiles to enzymes, based on frequency, duration, and level of exposure.
RESULTS: Workers were exposed to proteases, alpha-amylase, lipase and cellulase. The highest exposures occurred in the mixing area. Liquid spills with concentrated enzyme preparations and leakage of enzymes during weighing, transportation and filling were causing workplace contaminations and subsequently leading to both dermal and inhalation exposure for workers. Workers with the highest exposures reported significantly more work-related symptoms of itching nose (prevalence ratio (PR) = 4.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 12.0) and sneezing (PR = 4.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 10.8) and marginally significant more symptoms of wheezing (PR = 2.9, 95% CI 0.9 to 8.7) compared with the least exposed group. Fifteen workers (14.2%) were sensitised to > or = 1 enzymes. A marginally statistically significant gradient in sensitisation across the exposure categories was found (p = 0.09). There was a clinical case of occupational asthma and two others with probable occupational rhinitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Workers exposed to liquid detergent enzymes are at risk of developing sensitisation (14%) and respiratory allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687021     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.045245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  6 in total

1.  Occupational rhinitis.

Authors:  J Wesley Sublett; David I Bernstein
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Occupational rhinitis and asthma: where do we stand, where do we go?

Authors:  Roberto Castano; Jean-Luc Malo
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Industrial fungal enzymes: an occupational allergen perspective.

Authors:  Brett J Green; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-21

4.  Evaluation of pulmonary function among detergent powder factory workers- a cross sectional study in Semnan, Iran.

Authors:  Farhad Malek; Elham Ranjbari; Majid Mirmohammadkhani; Daryoush Pahlevan
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Experiences from occupational exposure limits set on aerosols containing allergenic proteins.

Authors:  Gunnar D Nielsen; Søren T Larsen; Jitka S Hansen; Lars K Poulsen
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-07-28

6.  Allergic sensitization: screening methods.

Authors:  Gregory S Ladics; Jeremy Fry; Richard Goodman; Corinne Herouet-Guicheney; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Charlotte B Madsen; André Penninks; Anna Pomés; Erwin L Roggen; Joost Smit; Jean-Michel Wal
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 5.871

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.