Literature DB >> 19686013

Neural correlates of individual differences in strategic retrieval processing.

Emma K Bridger1, Jane E Herron, Rachael L Elward, Edward L Wilding.   

Abstract

Processes engaged when information is encoded into memory are an important determinant of whether that information will be recovered subsequently. Also influential, however, are processes engaged at the time of retrieval, and these were investigated here by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure a specific class of retrieval operations. These operations were revealed by contrasts between ERPs elicited by new (unstudied) test items in distinct tasks, the assumption being that these contrasts index operations that are engaged in service of retrieval and that vary according to the demands of different retrieval tasks. Specific functional accounts of this class of retrieval processing operations assume that they influence the accuracy of memory judgments, and this experiment was designed to test for the first time whether this is in fact the case. Toward this end, participants completed 2 retrieval tasks while ERPs were acquired, and the extent to which processes were engaged differentially across tasks in service of retrieval was operationalized as the magnitude of the differences between the new-item ERPs that were elicited. This measure correlated positively with response accuracy on the tasks, which provides strong evidence that this class of retrieval processing operations benefits the accuracy of memory judgments. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686013     DOI: 10.1037/a0016375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Monetary rewards influence retrieval orientations.

Authors:  Teresa M Halsband; Nicola K Ferdinand; Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The costs of target prioritization and the external requirements for using a recall-to-reject strategy in memory exclusion tasks: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Top-down constraint on recognition memory.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

4.  The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.

Authors:  Chuanji Gao; Timm Rosburg; Mingzhu Hou; Bingbing Li; Xin Xiao; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Variations in constrained retrieval.

Authors:  Michael W Alban; Colleen M Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron; Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Separating content-specific retrieval from post-retrieval processing.

Authors:  Amie N Doidge; Lisa H Evans; Jane E Herron; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Direct electrophysiological evidence for the maintenance of retrieval orientations and the role of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jane E Herron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Preparation breeds success: Brain activity predicts remembering.

Authors:  Jane E Herron; Lisa H Evans
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Cognitive control depletion reduces pre-stimulus and recollection-related measures of strategic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2019-10-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.