Literature DB >> 19686011

Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy.

Peter F Delaney1, Peter P J L Verkoeijen.   

Abstract

Using 5 experiments, the authors explored the dependency of spacing effects on rehearsal patterns. Encouraging rehearsal borrowing produced opposing effects on mixed lists (containing both spaced and massed repetitions) and pure lists (containing only one or the other), magnifying spacing effects on mixed lists but diminishing spacing effects on pure lists. Rehearsing with borrowing produced large spacing effects on mixed lists but not on pure lists for both free recall (Experiment 1) and recognition (Experiment 2). In contrast, rehearsing only the currently visible item produced spacing effects on both mixed lists and pure lists in free recall (Experiment 3) and recognition (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 demonstrated these effects using a fully within-subjects design. Rehearse-aloud protocols showed that rehearsal borrowing redistributed study from massed to spaced items on mixed lists, especially during massed presentations. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686011     DOI: 10.1037/a0016380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  3 in total

1.  A retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall.

Authors:  Lynn L Siegel; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A deeper analysis of the spacing effect after "deep" encoding.

Authors:  Peter F Delaney; Arie S Spirgel; Thomas C Toppino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

3.  Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.

Authors:  Christopher A Rowland; Megan K Littrell-Baez; Amanda E Sensenig; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.