Literature DB >> 19684408

Comparison of long-term outcomes between spousal transplants and other living unrelated donor transplants: single-center experience.

Hye Eun Yoon1, Joon Chang Song, Bok Jin Hyoung, Hyeon Seok Hwang, So Young Lee, Youn Joo Jeon, Sun Cheol Park, Bum Soon Choi, Yong Soo Kim, In Sung Moon, Chul Woo Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The greater use of living unrelated donors (LUDs) as kidney donors is a worldwide trend in the current era of organ shortage, and spouses are an important source of LUDs. This study was to compare the long-term outcomes of spousal donor grafts with other LUD grafts.
METHODS: Among 445 LUD grafts, 77 were spouses and 368 were other LUDs. The clinical characteristics and long-term survival rates for spousal transplants were compared with those for other LUD transplants, and risk factors affecting graft survival were assessed.
RESULTS: Spousal donors had a significantly higher average number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (4.2 vs. 3.4, p < 0.001) and were older (41 vs. 33 years, p < 0.001) than LUDs. The 10-year survival rates for spousal donor grafts were 60.6%, similar to those for LUD grafts (58.5%, p = 0.61). The 10-year biopsy-proven acute rejection-free survival rates (85.5 vs. 89.6%, p = 0.45) and patient survival rates were also similar (84.3 vs. 79.6%, p = 0.35). The degree of HLA mismatching, the spousal donor type or donor age did not affect the graft survival.
CONCLUSION: Renal transplants from spousal donors show similar long-term outcomes to those from better HLA-matched and younger LUDs. (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684408     DOI: 10.1159/000235248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract        ISSN: 1660-2110


  6 in total

1.  Changing donor source pattern for kidney transplantation over 40 years: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Byung Ha Chung; Mi Hyang Jung; Sung Ha Bae; Suk Hui Kang; Hyeon Seok Hwang; Bok Jin Hyoung; So Young Lee; Youn Ju Jeon; Bum Soon Choi; Cheol Whee Park; Yong-Soo Kim; Ji-Il Kim; In Sung Moon; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.884

2.  Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Yu; Byung Ha Chung; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Partnership Satisfaction in Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Mariel Nöhre; Iris Pollmann; Marie Mikuteit; Karin Weissenborn; Faikah Gueler; Martina de Zwaan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Outcomes of Spousal versus Parental Donor Kidney Transplants: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Raghuram Bhat; Sajith Narayanan; Ismail Naduvileparambil Aboobacker; Benil Hafeeq; Feroz Aziz; Sreejesh Balakrishnan; Anjaney Yadur; Shysil Shafeeq; Sooraj Sasindran; Abdul Gafoor Pacheerikuth; N A Uvais
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 5.  How good is a living donor? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of donor demographics on post kidney transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Irene Bellini; Mikhail Nozdrin; Liset Pengel; Simon Knight; Vassilios Papalois
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Outcomes of spousal versus related donor kidney transplants: A comparative study.

Authors:  T Mittal; R Ramachandran; V Kumar; M Rathi; H S Kohli; V Jha; K L Gupta; M Minz; K Joshi; V Sakhuja
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.