Literature DB >> 19684292

Defining safe rehabilitation for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a biomechanical study.

Geoffrey A Bernas1, Ramon A Ruberte Thiele, Karen A Kinnaman, Richard E Hughes, Bruce S Miller, James E Carpenter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow using a variety of techniques has been successful in enabling overhead athletes with ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency to return to competition. Most current postoperative rehabilitation programs begin with a period of motion restriction, including limiting elbow extension, that is followed by a transition from elbow strengthening to an interval throwing program, to competition. Motion restrictions early in the postoperative period may increase the risk for contractures. There is limited information to support current motion restrictions.
PURPOSE: (1) To determine strain on the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament during a rehabilitation protocol that includes passive range of motion, isometric muscle contraction, and varus and valgus torques. (2) To develop guidelines for a safe initial rehabilitation protocol. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric elbows underwent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with the docking technique using a gracilis tendon graft. Differential variable reluctance transducers on the anterior and posterior bands of the reconstructed anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament were used to measure strain, while an optical motion tracking system monitored elbow motion. Strain was measured in the following 3 settings: passive range of motion, 22.2 N isometric flexion and extension contractions, and 3.34 N x m varus and valgus torques with the arm at 90 degrees of flexion.
RESULTS: Range of motion from maximum extension to 50 degrees of flexion produced 3% or less strain in both bands of the reconstructed ligament. Forearm rotation did not significantly affect strain in the anterior or posterior bands (P = .336 and P = .357). Strain at 90 degrees approached 7% in the posterior band (upper 95% confidence interval). Isometric muscle contractions had no measurable effect on strain. Varus torques decreased and valgus torques increased strain significantly (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: In the immediate postoperative period, full extension is safe, while flexion beyond 50 degrees may place deleterious strain on the reconstruction. Isometric flexion and extension exercises do not increase ligament strain but may be unsafe at 90 degrees of flexion, while valgus exercises (internal rotation at the shoulder) can increase strain in the reconstructed ligament. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results have implications for the development of appropriate rehabilitation protocols after ulnar collateral ligament reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684292     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509340658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.

Authors:  Timothy J Jackson; Shelby E Jarrell; Gregory J Adamson; Kyung Chil Chung; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries in athletes: Can we improve our outcomes?

Authors:  Lauren H Redler; Ryan M Degen; Lucas S McDonald; David W Altchek; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

3.  Rehabilitation of the Overhead Athlete's Elbow.

Authors:  Kevin E Wilk; Leonard C Macrina; E Lyle Cain; Jeffrey R Dugas; James R Andrews
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Postoperative rehabilitation in elbow surgery.

Authors:  Lotte Verstuyft; Pieter Caekebeke; Roger van Riet
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-18

5.  Reasons for Retirement Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Major League Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Junyoung Ahn; Peter N Chalmers; Christopher S Ahmad; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-21

Review 6.  Optimal management of ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hibberd; J Rodney Brown; Joseph T Hoffer
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.