Literature DB >> 19684227

Dynamic rearrangements determine genome organization and useful traits in soybean.

Kyung Do Kim1, Jin Hee Shin, Kyujung Van, Dong Hyun Kim, Suk-Ha Lee.   

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max) is a paleopolyploid whose genome has gone through at least two rounds of polyploidy and subsequent diploidization events. Several studies have investigated the changes in genome structure produced by the relatively recent polyploidy event, but little is known about the ancient polyploidy due to the high frequency of gene loss after duplication. Our previous study, regarding a region responsible for bacterial leaf pustule, reported two homeologous Rxp regions produced by the recent whole-genome duplication event. In this study, we identified the full set of four homeologous Rxp regions (ranging from 1.96 to 4.60 Mb) derived from both the recent and ancient polyploidy events, and this supports the quadruplicated structure of the soybean genome. Among the predicted genes on chromosome 17 (linkage group D2), 71% of them were conserved in a recently duplicated region, while 21% and 24% of duplicated genes were retained in two homeologous regions formed by the ancient polyploidy. Furthermore, comparative analysis showed a 2:1 relationship between soybean and Medicago truncatula, since M. truncatula did not undergo the recent polyploidy event that soybean did. Unlike soybean, M. truncatula homeologous regions were highly fractionated and their synteny did not exist, revealing different rates of diploidization process between the two species. Our data show that extensive synteny remained in the four homeologous regions in soybean, even though the soybean genome experienced dynamic genome rearrangements following paleopolyploidy events. Moreover, multiple Rxp quantitative trait loci on different soybean chromosomes actually comprise homeologous regions produced by two rounds of polyploidy events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684227      PMCID: PMC2773080          DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.141739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  44 in total

Review 1.  Legume genomes: more than peas in a pod.

Authors:  Nevin Dale Young; Joann Mudge; T H Noel Ellis
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  Molecular mapping of Rxp conditioning reaction to bacterial pustule in soybean.

Authors:  J M Narvel; L R Jakkula; D V Phillips; T Wang; S H Lee; H R Boerma
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  A soybean transcript map: gene distribution, haplotype and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis.

Authors:  Ik-Young Choi; David L Hyten; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Qijian Song; Julian M Chaky; Charles V Quigley; Kevin Chase; K Gordon Lark; Robert S Reiter; Mun-Sup Yoon; Eun-Young Hwang; Seung-In Yi; Nevin D Young; Randy C Shoemaker; Curtis P van Tassell; James E Specht; Perry B Cregan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chromosome-level homeology in paleopolyploid soybean (Glycine max) revealed through integration of genetic and chromosome maps.

Authors:  Jason G Walling; Randy Shoemaker; Nevin Young; Joann Mudge; Scott Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome duplication in soybean (Glycine subgenus soja).

Authors:  R C Shoemaker; K Polzin; J Labate; J Specht; E C Brummer; T Olson; N Young; V Concibido; J Wilcox; J P Tamulonis; G Kochert; H R Boerma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multiple flowering time QTLs within several Brassica species could be the result of duplicated copies of one ancestral gene.

Authors:  T Axeisson; O Shavorskaya; U Lagercrantz
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.166

7.  Sequence conservation of homeologous bacterial artificial chromosomes and transcription of homeologous genes in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.).

Authors:  Jessica A Schlueter; Brian E Scheffler; Shannon D Schlueter; Randy C Shoemaker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Estimates of conserved microsynteny among the genomes of Glycine max, Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  H H Yan; J Mudge; D-J Kim; D Larsen; R C Shoemaker; D R Cook; N D Young
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ.

Authors:  Scott Schwartz; W James Kent; Arian Smit; Zheng Zhang; Robert Baertsch; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Webb Miller
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Highly syntenic regions in the genomes of soybean, Medicago truncatula, and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Joann Mudge; Steven B Cannon; Peter Kalo; Giles E D Oldroyd; Bruce A Roe; Christopher D Town; Nevin D Young
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  23 in total

1.  The phylogeny and evolutionary history of the Lesion Simulating Disease (LSD) gene family in Viridiplantae.

Authors:  Caroline Cabreira; Alexandro Cagliari; Lauro Bücker-Neto; Márcia Margis-Pinheiro; Loreta B de Freitas; Maria Helena Bodanese-Zanettini
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  A Comparative Epigenomic Analysis of Polyploidy-Derived Genes in Soybean and Common Bean.

Authors:  Kyung Do Kim; Moaine El Baidouri; Brian Abernathy; Aiko Iwata-Otsubo; Carolina Chavarro; Michael Gonzales; Marc Libault; Jane Grimwood; Scott A Jackson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  QTL identification of flowering time at three different latitudes reveals homeologous genomic regions that control flowering in soybean.

Authors:  Weixian Liu; Moon Young Kim; Yang Jae Kang; Kyujung Van; Yeong-Ho Lee; Peerasak Srinives; Dong Lin Yuan; Suk-Ha Lee
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Changes in twelve homoeologous genomic regions in soybean following three rounds of polyploidy.

Authors:  Andrew J Severin; Steven B Cannon; Michelle M Graham; David Grant; Randy C Shoemaker
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Conservation and divergence of plant LHP1 protein sequences and expression patterns in angiosperms and gymnosperms.

Authors:  Hexin Guan; Zhengui Zheng; Paris H Grey; Yuhua Li; David G Oppenheimer
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 6.  Whole-genome sequencing and intensive analysis of the undomesticated soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) genome.

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Sunghoon Lee; Kyujung Van; Tae-Hyung Kim; Soon-Chun Jeong; Ik-Young Choi; Dae-Soo Kim; Yong-Seok Lee; Daeui Park; Jianxin Ma; Woo-Yeon Kim; Byoung-Chul Kim; Sungjin Park; Kyung-A Lee; Dong Hyun Kim; Kil Hyun Kim; Jin Hee Shin; Young Eun Jang; Kyung Do Kim; Wei Xian Liu; Tanapon Chaisan; Yang Jae Kang; Yeong-Ho Lee; Kook-Hyung Kim; Jung-Kyung Moon; Jeremy Schmutz; Scott A Jackson; Jong Bhak; Suk-Ha Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular sequence variations of the lipoxygenase-2 gene in soybean.

Authors:  Jin Hee Shin; Kyujung Van; Kyung Do Kim; Yeong-Ho Lee; Tae-Hwan Jun; Suk-Ha Lee
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Fine mapping of a resistance gene to bacterial leaf pustule in soybean.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Kil Hyun Kim; Kyujung Van; Moon Young Kim; Suk-Ha Lee
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Of the Nine Cytidine Deaminase-Like Genes in Arabidopsis, Eight Are Pseudogenes and Only One Is Required to Maintain Pyrimidine Homeostasis in Vivo.

Authors:  Mingjia Chen; Marco Herde; Claus-Peter Witte
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  Divergence of flowering genes in soybean.

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Jin Hee Shin; Yang Jae Kang; Sang Rea Shim; Suk-Ha Lee
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.