Literature DB >> 19684011

Activities of Daily Vision Scale: what do the subscales measure?

Vijaya K Gothwal1, Thomas A Wright, Ecosse L Lamoureux, Konrad Pesudovs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous Rasch analysis of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) did not address psychometric properties of its subscales or provide detailed assessment of dimensionality (whether the ADVS measures one or multiple constructs). This study was designed to examine these properties.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two participants (mean age, 74.2 years) awaiting cataract surgery self-administered the ADVS. Rasch analysis was used to assess the ADVS and its five subscales for unidimensionality (by principal components analysis, [PCA]), precision by person separation (discrimination between strata of participant ability), and targeting (matching of item difficulty to participant ability). Adequate person separation (minimum acceptable value, 2.0) is the fundamental requirement for measurement.
RESULTS: Only the near vision subscale had adequate measurement properties (person separation, 2.30). The entire ADVS showed a misfit to the Rasch model and lacked unidimensionality. PCA confirmed the presence of two additional traits-driving and glare disability-but neither possessed adequate person separation when assessed individually. Deleting these traits restored unidimensionality, but additional items misfit, necessitating item reduction. Finally, an eight-item ADVS-Near Vision Scale showed good fit and unidimensionality. Its contents were identical with the original near vision subscale. Targeting was suboptimal (2.30 logits).
CONCLUSIONS: Only one subscale, near vision, met the criteria for measurement. The revised eight-item ADVS-Near Vision subscale is a unidimensional measure of visual disability in cataract patients with mild visual disability. However, it is limited by measurement of near visual ability only. For more comprehensive measurement of visual disability, other questionnaires such as Catquest-9SF are preferable for cataract surgery outcomes assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684011     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A new look at the WHOQOL as health-related quality of life instrument among visually impaired people using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Marmamula Srinivas; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Development of an Elderly Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire for less-developed areas of China.

Authors:  Xiaoman Li; Jie Chen; Gengui Xu; Yin Zhong; Longfei Jang; Li Lin; Fan Lu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Reducing respondent burden: validation of the Brief Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire.

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Ryan E K Man; Gwyn Rees; Jill Keeffe; Tien Y Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Psychometric Assessment of the Chinese Version of the Indian Vision Functioning Questionnaire Based on the Method of Successive Dichotomizations.

Authors:  Rongrong Gao; Sisi Chen; Shixiang Yan; Tianhao Lu; Haisi Chen; Qi Feng; Qinmei Wang; Yong Sun; Jinhai Huang; Jyoti Khadka
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Seelam Bharani; Ramesh Kekunnaya; PreetiPatil Chhablani; Virender Sachdeva; Niranjan K Pehere; Asa Narasaiah; Rekha Gunturu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Measuring coping in parents of children with disabilities: a rasch model approach.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Seelam Bharani; Shailaja P Reddy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Vijaya K Gothwal; Colm McAlinden; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  The patient health questionnaire-9: validation among patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Deepak K Bagga; Seelam Bharani; Rebecca Sumalini; Shailaja P Reddy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population.

Authors:  Xianchai Lin; Mingge Li; Mei Wang; Yajing Zuo; Siping Zhu; Yongxin Zheng; Xiaofeng Lin; Minbin Yu; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.