Literature DB >> 19683955

Determination of body segment masses and centers of mass using a force plate method in individuals of different morphology.

Mohsen Damavandi1, Nader Farahpour, Paul Allard.   

Abstract

Body segment masses and center of mass (COM) locations are required to calculate intersegmental forces and net joint moments using inverse or forward dynamics equations. These inertial properties are estimated from methods involving cadavers or living individuals. The present clinical methods are limited to similar populations from which the anthropometric measures were obtained. This study presented a simple force plate method that can be used to determine subject-specific segment masses and COM locations and compared it to other well-known methods. The proposed method was tested in individuals with different body mass index (i.e., lean, normal, and obese) to verify its sensitivity. All the segmental mass and COM values obtained from the force plate method were within the range of those of the other methods for the entire sample. Significant differences were identified between the morphological groups in relative segmental masses at the upper arm and leg and foot, and COM locations at the leg and foot and head and trunk as obtained from the force plate method (p<0.05). The proposed method involves direct procedures to determine subject-specific segmental masses and COM locations. It is sensitive to detect differences between various morphological populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683955     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Effect of the intra-abdominal pressure and the center of segmental body mass on the lumbar spine mechanics - a computational parametric study.

Authors:  W M Park; S Wang; Y H Kim; K B Wood; J A Sim; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Predictive regression modeling of body segment parameters using individual-based anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  Zachary Merrill; Subashan Perera; Rakié Cham
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Reliability of the elliptical zone method of estimating body segment parameters of swimmers.

Authors:  Ross H Sanders; Chuang-Yuan Chiu; Tomohiro Gonjo; Jacki Thow; Nuno Oliveira; Stelios G Psycharakis; Carl J Payton; Carla B McCabe
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Horizontal body and trunk center of mass offset and standing balance in scoliotic girls.

Authors:  G Dalleau; M Damavandi; P Leroyer; C Verkindt; C H Rivard; P Allard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Determination of the center of mass in a heterogeneous population of dogs.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Wanda J Gordon-Evans; B Duncan X Lascelles; Michael G Conzemius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.