Literature DB >> 19683797

Multicenter evaluation of a new quantitative highly sensitive D-dimer assay, the Hemosil D-dimer HS 500, in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism.

Cristina Legnani1, Michela Cini, Dimitrios Scarvelis, Pierre Toulon, Jogin R Wu, Gualtiero Palareti.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: D-dimer testing is widely used in conjunction with clinical pretest probability (PTP) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) exclusion. We report on a multicenter evaluation of a new, automated, latex enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay [HemosIL D-Dimer HS 500, Instrumentation Laboratory (IL)].
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 747 consecutive outpatients with suspected proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n=401) or pulmonary embolism (PE, n=346) were evaluated at four university hospitals in a management study with a 3 month follow-up. Samples were tested at each center using the new D-dimer assay on an automated coagulation analyzer [ACL TOP (IL)], with clinical cut-off for VTE at 500 ng/mL (FEU).
RESULTS: The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100% for all PTP subgroups (no false negative results); for both sensitivity and NPV the lower limit of the 95% CI in patients with moderate/low PTP was higher than 95%. The overall specificity was 45.1% (95%CI: 41.1-49.3%). Higher specificity value was recorded in the low PTP subgroup [49.2% (95%CI: 41.7-56.7)]. No significant differences were found between patients suspected of having DVT or PE; sensitivity and NPV were 100%. The reproducibility of the assay was good, being the total CVs% less than 10% for D-dimer concentration near the clinical cut-off.
CONCLUSIONS: The new, highly sensitive D-dimer assay proved to be accurate when used for VTE diagnostic work-up in outpatients. Based on 100% sensitivity and NPV and lower limit of the 95% CI higher than 95%, the assay can be used as a stand-alone test in patients with non high PTP. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683797     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  14 in total

Review 1.  D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Alina Andras; Karen Welch; Karen Sheares; David Keeling; Francesca M Chappell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Payal Patel; Parth Patel; Meha Bhatt; Cody Braun; Housne Begum; Robby Nieuwlaat; Rasha Khatib; Carolina C Martins; Yuan Zhang; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Jamie Varghese; Hani Alturkmani; Waled Bahaj; Mariam Baig; Rohan Kehar; Ahmad Mustafa; Rakesh Ponnapureddy; Anchal Sethi; Merrill Thomas; David Wooldridge; Wendy Lim; Shannon M Bates; Eddy Lang; Grégoire Le Gal; Marc Righini; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger J Schünemann; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

3.  Negative D-dimer testing excludes pulmonary embolism in non-high risk patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; Scott K Nagle; Mark L Schiebler; Michael S Pulia; James E Svenson; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24

4.  Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Melanie Tan; Roger E G Schutgens; Shannon M Bates; Arnaud Perrier; Cristina Legnani; Douwe H Biesma; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Henri Bounameaux; Gualtiero Palareti; Marc Carrier; Gerben C Mol; Grégoire Le Gal; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Marc Righini
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  D-dimer value in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism-may it exclude only?

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora-Skrabaka; Damian Skrabaka; Paolo Ruggeri; Gaetano Caramori; Szymon Skoczyński; Adam Barczyk
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  The relationship between coagulation abnormality and mortality in ICU patients: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Aihua Fei; Qiang Lin; Jiafu Liu; Feilong Wang; Hairong Wang; Shuming Pan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy scheduled for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Le Liu; Yan-Bin Liu; Jian-Min Sun; Hai-Feng Hou; Chen Liang; Tao Li; Heng-Tao Qi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henrike J Schouten; G J Geersing; H L Koek; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Kristel J M Janssen; Renée A Douma; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-03

Review 9.  Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  Swaroopa Pulivarthi; Murali Krishna Gurram
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-10

10.  Validation of STA-Liatest D-Di assay for exclusion of pulmonary embolism according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute/Food and Drug Administration guideline. Results of a multicenter management study.

Authors:  Gilles Pernod; Haifeng Wu; Emmanuel de Maistre; John Lazarchick; Jeannine Kassis; Carlos Aguilar; Pascual M Vera; Gualtiero Palareti; Armando D'Angelo
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.