PURPOSE: Urethroplasty remains the gold standard for the management of urethral stricture disease with acceptable long-term success. However, the standard by which stricture recurrence is defined and evaluated after urethral reconstruction remains widely variable. We conducted a systematic review of the urological literature to determine how stricture recurrence is defined and evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on all contemporary urethroplasty articles published between 2000 and 2008. Using the term "urethroplasty" 302 articles were identified and evaluated. A total of 86 articles were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate for all reconstructive procedures was 15.6%, which remained stable between 2000 and 2008. Stricture recurrence was determined by a mean of 3 (range 1 to 8) different diagnostic tests. The most common primary diagnostic tests for recurrence were uroflowmetry (56% of articles) and retrograde urethrography (51%). Cystourethroscopy was used as a primary screen to identify stricture recurrence in 25% of articles, and as a secondary procedure in another 21%. Recurrence was defined as the need for an additional surgical procedure or dilation in 75% and 52% of articles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used to determine stricture recurrence after urethroplasty remain widely variable. The use of a standardized surveillance protocol to define stricture recurrence after urethral reconstruction may allow more effective comparison of urethroplasty outcomes across institutions.
PURPOSE: Urethroplasty remains the gold standard for the management of urethral stricture disease with acceptable long-term success. However, the standard by which stricture recurrence is defined and evaluated after urethral reconstruction remains widely variable. We conducted a systematic review of the urological literature to determine how stricture recurrence is defined and evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on all contemporary urethroplasty articles published between 2000 and 2008. Using the term "urethroplasty" 302 articles were identified and evaluated. A total of 86 articles were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate for all reconstructive procedures was 15.6%, which remained stable between 2000 and 2008. Stricture recurrence was determined by a mean of 3 (range 1 to 8) different diagnostic tests. The most common primary diagnostic tests for recurrence were uroflowmetry (56% of articles) and retrograde urethrography (51%). Cystourethroscopy was used as a primary screen to identify stricture recurrence in 25% of articles, and as a secondary procedure in another 21%. Recurrence was defined as the need for an additional surgical procedure or dilation in 75% and 52% of articles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used to determine stricture recurrence after urethroplasty remain widely variable. The use of a standardized surveillance protocol to define stricture recurrence after urethral reconstruction may allow more effective comparison of urethroplasty outcomes across institutions.
Authors: Shyam Sukumar; Sean P Elliott; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke; Thomas G Smith; Alexandra M C Carolan; Michael Maidaa; Alex J Vanni; Benjamin N Breyer; Bradley A Erickson Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Christopher A Tam; Sean P Elliott; Bryan B Voelzke; Jeremy B Myers; Alex J Vanni; Benjamin N Breyer; Thomas G Smith; Christopher D McClung; Bradley A Erickson Journal: Urology Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Elizabeth Timbrook Brown; Stephen Mock; Roger Dmochowski; W Stuart Reynolds; Douglas Milam; Melissa R Kaufman Journal: Ther Adv Urol Date: 2016-12-02
Authors: Uwais B Zaid; Mitchel Hawkins; Leslie Wilson; Jie Ting; Catherine Harris; Amjad Alwaal; Lee C Zhao; Allen F Morey; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Urology Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Nima Baradaran; Kirkpatrick B Fergus; Rachel A Moses; Darshan P Patel; Thomas W Gaither; Bryan B Voelzke; Thomas G Smith; Bradley A Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Nejd F Alsikafi; Alex J Vanni; Jill Buckley; Lee C Zhao; Jeremy B Myers; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Rachel A Mann; Ramón Virasoro; Jessica M DeLong; Rafael E Estrella; Merycarla Pichardo; Ramón Rodríguez Lay; Gustavo Espino; Joshua D Roth; Sean P Elliott Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 1.862