Literature DB >> 19682306

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.

T Lislevand1, J Figuerola, T Székely.   

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is often assumed to be driven by three major selective processes: (1) sexual selection influencing male size and thus mating success, (2) fecundity selection acting on females and (3) inter-sexual resource division favouring different size in males and females to reduce competition for resources. Sexual selection should be particularly strong in species that exhibit lek polygyny, since male mating success is highly skewed in such species. We investigated whether these three selective processes are related to SSD evolution in grouse and allies (Phasianidae). Male-biased SSD increased with body size (Rensch's rule) and lekking species exhibited more male-biased SSD than nonlekking ones. Directional phylogenetic analyses indicated that lekking evolved before SSD, but conclusions were highly dependent on the body size traits and chosen model values. There was no relationship between SSD and male display agility, nor did resource division influence SSD. Although clutch mass increased with female body size it was not related to the degree of SSD. Taken together, the results are most consistent with the hypothesis that lekking behaviour led to the evolution of male-biased SSD in Phasianidae.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19682306     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01802.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  Selection for increased male size predicts variation in sexual size dimorphism among fish species.

Authors:  Curtis R Horne; Andrew G Hirst; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Variety, sex and ontogenetic differences in the pelvic limb muscle architectural properties of leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and their links with locomotor performance.

Authors:  Kayleigh A Rose; Robert L Nudds; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Understanding sex differences in the cost of terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  John J Lees; Robert L Nudds; Lars P Folkow; Karl-Arne Stokkan; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assessing phylogenetic relationships among galliformes: a multigene phylogeny with expanded taxon sampling in Phasianidae.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Rebecca T Kimball; Edward L Braun; Bin Liang; Zhengwang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A macroevolutionary perspective on multiple sexual traits in the phasianidae (galliformes).

Authors:  Rebecca T Kimball; Colette M St Mary; Edward L Braun
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-02

6.  Body proportions for the facilitation of walking, running and flying: the case of partridges.

Authors:  Jesús Nadal; Carolina Ponz; Antoni Margalida
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Sperm quality and quantity evolve through different selective processes in the Phasianidae.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Mao Jun Zhong; Stefan Lüpold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  One tree to link them all: a phylogenetic dataset for the European tetrapoda.

Authors:  Cristina Roquet; Sébastien Lavergne; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-08-08

9.  Ontogenic differences in sexual size dimorphism across four plover populations.

Authors:  Natalie Dos Remedios; Tamás Székely; Clemens Küpper; Patricia L M Lee; András Kosztolányi
Journal:  Ibis (Lond 1859)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.517

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.