Literature DB >> 19680795

Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.

Radojka Savic1, Marc Lavielle.   

Abstract

Analysis of count data from clinical trials using mixed effect analysis has recently become widely used. However, algorithms available for the parameter estimation, including LAPLACE and Gaussian quadrature (GQ), are associated with certain limitations, including bias in parameter estimates and the long analysis runtime. The stochastic approximation expectation maximization (SAEM) algorithm has proven to be a very efficient and powerful tool in the analysis of continuous data. The aim of this study was to implement and investigate the performance of a new SAEM algorithm for application to count data. A new SAEM algorithm was implemented in MATLAB for estimation of both, parameters and the Fisher information matrix. Stochastic Monte Carlo simulations followed by re-estimation were performed according to scenarios used in previous studies (part I) to investigate properties of alternative algorithms (Plan et al., 2008, Abstr 1372 [ http://wwwpage-meetingorg/?abstract=1372 ]). A single scenario was used to explore six probability distribution models. For parameter estimation, the relative bias was less than 0.92% and 4.13% for fixed and random effects, for all models studied including ones accounting for over- or under-dispersion. Empirical and estimated relative standard errors were similar, with distance between them being <1.7% for all explored scenarios. The longest CPU time was 95 s for parameter estimation and 56 s for SE estimation. The SAEM algorithm was extended for analysis of count data. It provides accurate estimates of both, parameters and standard errors. The estimation is significantly faster compared to LAPLACE and GQ. The algorithm is implemented in Monolix 3.1, (beta-version available in July 2009).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19680795      PMCID: PMC2881036          DOI: 10.1007/s10928-009-9127-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of actual significance levels for covariate effects in NONMEM.

Authors:  U Wählby; E N Jonsson; M O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Metrics for external model evaluation with an application to the population pharmacokinetics of gliclazide.

Authors:  Karl Brendel; Emmanuelle Comets; Céline Laffont; Christian Laveille; France Mentré
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  A survey of population analysis methods and software for complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with examples.

Authors:  Robert J Bauer; Serge Guzy; Chee Ng
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods.

Authors:  Yaning Wang
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Importance of shrinkage in empirical bayes estimates for diagnostics: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Radojka M Savic; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Performance in population models for count data, part I: maximum likelihood approximations.

Authors:  Elodie L Plan; Alan Maloney; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software.

Authors:  Marc Lavielle; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Evaluation of mixture modeling with count data using NONMEM.

Authors:  Bill Frame; Raymond Miller; Richard L Lalonde
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Modelling overdispersion and Markovian features in count data.

Authors:  Iñaki F Trocóniz; Elodie L Plan; Raymond Miller; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.745

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Performance comparison of various maximum likelihood nonlinear mixed-effects estimation methods for dose-response models.

Authors:  Elodie L Plan; Alan Maloney; France Mentré; Mats O Karlsson; Julie Bertrand
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Radojka M Savic; France Mentré; Marc Lavielle
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7.

Authors:  Åsa M Johansson; Sebastian Ueckert; Elodie L Plan; Andrew C Hooker; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  A pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation study identifying gender differences of daily olanzapine dose and dopamine D2-receptor occupancy.

Authors:  Andy R Eugene; Jolanta Masiak
Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.202

5.  Gender based Dosing of Metoprolol in the Elderly using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations.

Authors:  Andy R Eugene
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-19

6.  Evaluation of estimation methods and power of tests of discrete covariates in repeated time-to-event parametric models: application to Gaucher patients treated by imiglucerase.

Authors:  Marie Vigan; Jérôme Stirnemann; France Mentré
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Modeling and simulation of count data.

Authors:  E L Plan
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-13

8.  Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.

Authors:  Sudeep Pradhan; Byungjeong Song; Jaeyeon Lee; Jung-Woo Chae; Kyung Im Kim; Hyun-Moon Back; Nayoung Han; Kwang-Il Kwon; Hwi-Yeol Yun
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.