Literature DB >> 19680793

Age and disability employment discrimination: occupational rehabilitation implications.

Melissa J Bjelland1, Susanne M Bruyère, Sarah von Schrader, Andrew J Houtenville, Antonio Ruiz-Quintanilla, Douglas A Webber.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As concerns grow that a thinning labor force due to retirement will lead to worker shortages, it becomes critical to support positive employment outcomes of groups who have been underutilized, specifically older workers and workers with disabilities. Better understanding perceived age and disability discrimination and their intersection can help rehabilitation specialists and employers address challenges expected as a result of the evolving workforce.
METHODS: Using U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Integrated Mission System data, we investigate the nature of employment discrimination charges that cite the Americans with Disabilities Act or Age Discrimination in Employment Act individually or jointly. We focus on trends in joint filings over time and across categories of age, types of disabilities, and alleged discriminatory behavior.
RESULTS: We find that employment discrimination claims that originate from older or disabled workers are concentrated within a subset of issues that include reasonable accommodation, retaliation, and termination. Age-related disabilities are more frequently referenced in joint cases than in the overall pool of ADA filings, while the psychiatric disorders are less often referenced in joint cases. When examining charges made by those protected under both the ADA and ADEA, results from a logit model indicate that in comparison to charges filed under the ADA alone, jointly-filed ADA/ADEA charges are more likely to be filed by older individuals, by those who perceive discrimination in hiring and termination, and to originate from within the smallest firms.
CONCLUSION: In light of these findings, rehabilitation and workplace practices to maximize the hiring and retention of older workers and those with disabilities are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19680793      PMCID: PMC2980632          DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9194-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  5 in total

1.  No foot in the door: an experimental study of employment discrimination against older workers.

Authors:  M Bendick; L E Brown; K Wall
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  1999

2.  Workplace accommodations: evidence based outcomes.

Authors:  Helen A Schartz; D J Hendricks; Peter Blanck
Journal:  Work       Date:  2006

3.  User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations.

Authors:  Michael Williams; Dory Sabata; Jesse Zolna
Journal:  Work       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Meeting the challenges of an aging workforce.

Authors:  Michael Silverstein
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Stuck at the bottom rung: occupational characteristics of workers with disabilities.

Authors:  H Stephen Kaye
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-07
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Introduction to demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities.

Authors:  Fong Chan; David Strauser; Robert Gervey; Eun-Jeong Lee
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Ableism and Workplace Discrimination Among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sally Lindsay; Kristina Fuentes; Vanessa Tomas; Shaelynn Hsu
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Economic gradient of onset of disability in India.

Authors:  Radhe Shyam Mishra; Sanjay K Mohanty; Jack Cordes; Umakanta Sahoo; Rajeev R Singh; S V Subramanian
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Aging at Work: A Review of Recent Trends and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jasmina Barakovic Husic; Francisco José Melero; Sabina Barakovic; Petre Lameski; Eftim Zdravevski; Petra Maresova; Ondrej Krejcar; Ivan Chorbev; Nuno M Garcia; Vladimir Trajkovik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.