Literature DB >> 19680053

Evaluation of the position and function of aqueous drainage implants with magnetic resonance imaging.

Efstathios T Detorakis1, Thomas Maris, Efrosini Papadaki, Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris, Apostolos H Karantanas, Ioannis G Pallikaris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate position and function of antiglaucomatous Ahmed and Molteno shunts using magnetic resonance imaging with head and surface coils.
METHODS: Eight patients (5 males) with shunt implants were included, 4 with Ahmed (FP-7) and 4 with Molteno (s1, single plated). All patients were operated at least 6 months before imaging. In 3 cases (2 with Molteno and 1 with Ahmed shunt), the intraocular pressure (IOP) was above 21 mm Hg, despite maximal medical treatment. The shunt endplate, tube and filtering blebs were identified in T1-weighted and T2-weighted images with both head and surface coils. Volumetric measurements of the orbits, eyeball, and filtering bleb and calculation of the endplate position along sagittal, transverse, and vertical axes were performed in T1-weighted and T2-weighted images using head coils.
RESULTS: The shunt endplate was identified in T1-weighted and T2-weighted images (head coils) as a low intensity (dark) circumlinear band at the superotemporal aspect of the eyeball, surrounded by a pocket of water density, corresponding to the filtering bleb. The anterior position of the endplate, and smaller volume of the orbital cavity (less available orbital space) were associated with higher IOP. Filtering bleb volume was inversely correlated with IOP. In the unsuccessful cases, filtering bleb was absent.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into the mechanism of aqueous outflow and causes of failure of shunts. A lower orbital volume is associated with anterior position of the shunt endplate and poor shunt performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19680053     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181895e42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging reveals possible cause of diplopia after Baerveldt glaucoma implantation.

Authors:  Esma Islamaj; Luc Van Vught; Caroline P Jordaan-Kuip; Koenraad A Vermeer; Teresa A Ferreira; Peter W T De Waard; Hans G Lemij; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Lacrimal Gland Changes on Orbital Imaging after Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah M Jacobs; Raghu C Mudumbai; A J Amadi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

3.  Assessment of Filtration Bleb and Endplate Positioning Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eyes Implanted with Long-Tube Glaucoma Drainage Devices.

Authors:  Ichiya Sano; Masaki Tanito; Koji Uchida; Takashi Katsube; Hajime Kitagaki; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Blebs Morphology of Ahmed Valves.

Authors:  Joana Ferreira; Fernando Fernandes; Madalena Patricio; Ana Brás; Cristina Rios; Ingeborg Stalmans; Luis Abegão Pinto
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  Evaluation of Bleb Fluid After Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kentaro Iwasaki; Masayuki Kanamoto; Yuji Takihara; Shogo Arimura; Yoshihiro Takamura; Hirohiko Kimura; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.