Literature DB >> 1967964

Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization.

R Rajan1.   

Abstract

The effects of inferior collicular (IC) stimulation on cochlear responses were tested with pulsed electrical trains and with 1 min long continuous bursts. Pulsed trains did not cause any effects at the contralateral cochlea. However, a 1 min burst, containing pulses at low rates, was able to significantly reduce temporary threshold shifts (TTS) in cochlear sensitivity caused by a loud sound exposure. Intracochlear perfusion of hexamethonium blocked this effect. The time course of the hexamethonium blocking action paralleled its blocking action on the cochlear effects of electrical stimulation at the brainstem of an auditory efferent pathway, the crossed olivocochlear bundle (COCB). The protective IC effects were persistent and TTS reductions could be obtained even with a 5 min delay between IC stimulus and the loud sound. However, these persistent protective effects did not appear to occur at the cochlea. Finally, electrical stimulation at the IC ipsilateral to a cochlea exposed to loud sound also reduced TTS, but only by smaller amounts and at higher stimulation rates. Thus the IC appears to provide a strong descending influence that modulates the excitability levels of the olivocochlear nuclei in the brainstem. Both crossed and uncrossed OCB appear to be involved and able to reduce TTS. It is proposed that the protective effects may be due solely to the medial olivocochlear system and possibly only those fibres originating from one of the nuclei of the medial system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1967964     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91251-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cells in auditory cortex that project to the cochlear nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Brett R Schofield; Diana L Coomes; Ryan M Schofield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24

3.  Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B J Ceranic; D K Prasher; E Raglan; L M Luxon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Olivocochlear efferent control in sound localization and experience-dependent learning.

Authors:  Samuel Irving; David R Moore; M Charles Liberman; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  F1 (CBA×C57) mice show superior hearing in old age relative to their parental strains: hybrid vigor or a new animal model for "golden ears"?

Authors:  Robert D Frisina; Ameet Singh; Matthew Bak; Sara Bozorg; Rahul Seth; Xiaoxia Zhu
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Distribution and dendritic features of three groups of rat olivocochlear neurons. A study with two retrograde cholera toxin tracers.

Authors:  D E Vetter; E Mugnaini
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1992

Review 7.  The nicotinic receptor of cochlear hair cells: a possible pharmacotherapeutic target?

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Eleonora Katz; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Molecular biology of hearing.

Authors:  Timo Stöver; Marc Diensthuber
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.