Literature DB >> 19679636

Medical record review conduction model for improving interrater reliability of abstracting medical-related information.

Lisa Engel1, Courtney Henderson, Jennifer Fergenbaum, Angela Colantonio.   

Abstract

Medical record review (MRR) is often used in clinical research and evaluation, yet there is limited literature regarding best practices in conducting a MRR, and there are few studies reporting interrater reliability (IRR) from MRR data. The aim of this research was twofold: (a) to develop a MRR abstraction tool and standardize the MRR process and (b) to examine the IRR from MRR data. This study introduces the MRR-Conduction Model, which was used to implement a MRR, and examines the IRR between two abstractors who collected preinjury medical and psychiatric, incident-related medical and postinjury head symptom information from the medical records of 47 neurologically injured workers. Results showed that the percentage agreement was > or =85% and the unweighted kappa statistic was > or =.60 for most variables, indicating substantial IRR. An effective and reliable MRR to abstract medical-related information requires planning and time. The MRR-Conduction Model is proposed to guide the process of creating a MRR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679636     DOI: 10.1177/0163278709338561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  8 in total

1.  Methods to achieve high interrater reliability in data collection from primary care medical records.

Authors:  Clare Liddy; Miriam Wiens; William Hogg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  A four-phase approach for systematically collecting data and measuring medication discrepancies when patients transition between health care settings.

Authors:  Korey A Kennelty; Matthew J Witry; Michael Gehring; Melissa Dattalo; Nicole Rogus-Pulia
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2015-09-12

3.  Overcoming the Challenges of Unstructured Data in Multisite, Electronic Medical Record-based Abstraction.

Authors:  Brock Polnaszek; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Melissa Hovanes; Rachel Roiland; Patrick Ferguson; Roger Brown; Amy J H Kind
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Factors Affecting Accuracy of Data Abstracted from Medical Records.

Authors:  Meredith N Zozus; Carl Pieper; Constance M Johnson; Todd R Johnson; Amy Franklin; Jack Smith; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Documentation of breakthrough pain in narrative clinical records of children with life-limiting conditions: Feasibility of a retrospective review.

Authors:  Linda Jm Oostendorp; Dilini Rajapakse; Paula Kelly; Joanna Crocker; Andrew Dinsdale; Lorna Fraser; Myra Bluebond-Langner
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.979

6.  Risk factors associated with preterm birth in the Dominican Republic: a case-control study.

Authors:  Agustín Díaz-Rodríguez; Leandro Feliz-Matos; Carlos Bienvenido Ruiz Matuk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Reliability of medical record abstraction by non-physicians for orthopedic research.

Authors:  Michael Y Mi; Jamie E Collins; Vladislav Lerner; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Easier said than done!: methodological challenges with conducting maternal death review research in Malawi.

Authors:  Viva Combs Thorsen; Johanne Sundby; Tarek Meguid; Address Malata
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.