PURPOSE: To prospectively analyze prostate intrafraction motion in the prone vs. supine position and to assess patient satisfaction with these two positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen prostate cancer patients underwent implantation of five fiducial gold seeds in their prostate for localization. Patients were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy to 2,200 cGy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to 5,040 cGy. Patients underwent computed tomography simulation and IMRT in the prone position. For the first five IMRT treatments, an electronic portal imaging system was used to acquire anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images pretreatment and posttreatment. We then repositioned each patient supine and repeated the process, resulting in 600 images. RESULTS: Mean +/- standard deviation intrafraction prostate motion was 2.1 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.7 +/- 1.4 mm (AP, p = 0.47), 2.2 +/- 2.0 mm and 1.6 +/- 1.8 mm (superoinferior, p = 0.16), and 1.0 +/- 1.2 mm and 0.6 +/- 0.9 mm (left-right, p = 0.03) in the prone and supine positions, respectively. Eighty percent of patients stated that they were more comfortable in the supine position (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prone and supine positions resulted in a similar magnitude of AP and superoinferior intrafraction prostate motion (2 mm). Because there was no significant difference in the magnitude of AP and superoinferior prostate motion prone vs. supine and patients were more comfortable in the supine position, patients now undergo IMRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles at our center in the supine position.
PURPOSE: To prospectively analyze prostate intrafraction motion in the prone vs. supine position and to assess patient satisfaction with these two positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen prostate cancerpatients underwent implantation of five fiducial gold seeds in their prostate for localization. Patients were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy to 2,200 cGy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to 5,040 cGy. Patients underwent computed tomography simulation and IMRT in the prone position. For the first five IMRT treatments, an electronic portal imaging system was used to acquire anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images pretreatment and posttreatment. We then repositioned each patient supine and repeated the process, resulting in 600 images. RESULTS: Mean +/- standard deviation intrafraction prostate motion was 2.1 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.7 +/- 1.4 mm (AP, p = 0.47), 2.2 +/- 2.0 mm and 1.6 +/- 1.8 mm (superoinferior, p = 0.16), and 1.0 +/- 1.2 mm and 0.6 +/- 0.9 mm (left-right, p = 0.03) in the prone and supine positions, respectively. Eighty percent of patients stated that they were more comfortable in the supine position (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prone and supine positions resulted in a similar magnitude of AP and superoinferior intrafraction prostate motion (2 mm). Because there was no significant difference in the magnitude of AP and superoinferior prostate motion prone vs. supine and patients were more comfortable in the supine position, patients now undergo IMRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles at our center in the supine position.
Authors: Jeffrey R Olsen; Parag J Parikh; Michael Watts; Camille E Noel; Kenneth W Baker; Lakshmi Santanam; Jeff M Michalski Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Tomasz Bajon; Tomasz Piotrowski; Andrzej Antczak; Bartosz Bąk; Barbara Błasiak; Joanna Kaźmierska Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2011-02-01
Authors: Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-10-20
Authors: Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-03-20