Literature DB >> 19678730

Ethics: views from IACUC members.

Lisa Houde1, Claude Dumas, Thérèse Leroux.   

Abstract

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) members were interviewed on various ethical matters, including ethics, animal ethics, science and ethics, and the use of animals in research, in order to explore their implicit ethical framework. The results revealed that IACUC members entertain rich and diverse beliefs about ethics, that are part of an implicit ethical framework which relates to different domains of knowledge, such as biology (differences between human and animals), psychology (e.g. affective relationships with pets), and so on. The results also revealed that IACUC members hold quite a restrictive view on both animal ethics and animal use in research, and that they apply implicit ethical notions, such as respect and justice, to some elements (e.g. ethical rules) of the explicit ethical framework they are provided with when performing ethical evaluations of animal use. The study suggests that IACUC members should be provided with more up-to-date information on topics such as animal ethics and animal use in research. 2009 FRAME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19678730     DOI: 10.1177/026119290903700311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  Madeline L Budda; Stacy L Pritt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Survey of Canadian animal-based researchers' views on the Three Rs: replacement, reduction and refinement.

Authors:  Nicole Fenwick; Peter Danielson; Gilly Griffin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.

Authors:  Orsolya Varga
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Strategic focus on 3R principles reveals major reductions in the use of animals in pharmaceutical toxicity testing.

Authors:  Elin Törnqvist; Anita Annas; Britta Granath; Elisabeth Jalkesten; Ian Cotgreave; Mattias Öberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.

Authors:  Svea Jörgensen; Johan Lindsjö; Elin M Weber; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.