Literature DB >> 1967626

Comparative efficacy of cefoperazone, cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, and penicillin G against anaerobic bacteria in an animal model.

J A Moody1, C E Fasching, L M Sinn, D N Gerding, L R Peterson.   

Abstract

Treatment efficacy of various antimicrobial regimens against anaerobes was studied in semipermeable chambers simulating a closed-space, locally neutropenic infection site in rabbits. Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides melaninogenicus, Clostridium perfringens, and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius were inoculated (at a mean of 5.3 log10 CFU/ml in prereduced pooled rabbit serum) into the chambers (one isolate per chamber) in triplicate. Antimicrobial therapy consisted of cefoperazone, cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole (against the gram-negative anaerobes), or penicillin G (against the gram-positive anaerobes), beginning 4 hours after organism inoculation and continuing every 6 hours for 16 doses. With the use of anaerobic techniques for specimen acquisition, transport, and culture, quantitative bacterial findings were measured at the start of therapy and at various time points thereafter. Antibiotic concentrations were measured in blood and chamber fluid by liquid chromatography or bioassay methods. At the end of the study in vivo organisms were reduced by at least 3 log10 CFU/ml from drug-free growth control chambers by all the antimicrobial regimens tested except for cefoperazone against B. fragilis and ciprofloxacin against the three isolates tested. The addition of sulbactam to cefoperazone inhibited B. fragilis beta-lactamase activity and eradicated B. fragilis in vivo. In vivo results with this model confirmed in vitro susceptibilities of all tested antimicrobials except ciprofloxacin and should provide useful indications of the potential clinical efficacy of other new agents against anaerobes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1967626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Clin Med        ISSN: 0022-2143


  2 in total

1.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Cefepime in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.

Authors:  Jien-Wei Liu; Yen-Hsu Chen; Wen-Sen Lee; Jung-Chung Lin; Ching-Tai Huang; Hsi-Hsun Lin; Yung-Ching Liu; Yin-Ching Chuang; Hung-Jen Tang; Yao-Shen Chen; Wen-Chien Ko; Min-Chi Lu; Fu-Der Wang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Imipenem-cilastatin versus sulbactam-cefoperazone plus amikacin in the initial treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  O Ozyilkan; U Yalçintaş; S Başkan
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.884

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.