Literature DB >> 19675496

Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration.

Abigail M Bedient1, Jessica B Adams, David A Edwards, Daniel H Serravite, Emy Huntsman, Sara E Mow, Bernard A Roos, Joseph F Signorile.   

Abstract

Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been shown to be effective for increasing lower-body power; however, the combination of frequency, displacement, and duration that elicits the best acute response has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to identify the protocol eliciting the greatest improvement in power after an acute bout of WBV. Forty men and women participated in this study, in which 8 different combinations of 30, 35, 40, and 50 Hz with 2-mm and 5-mm displacements were tested over 3 days. For all protocols, randomized to reduce potential order effects, subjects underwent 30 seconds of WBV while holding an isometric squat at a knee angle of 2.27 rad. Power was assessed by countermovement jumps. Subjects performed 3 jumps before WBV, immediately afterward, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes later. The highest normalized peak power (nPP) at each time point was determined using a 4 (frequency) x 2 (displacement) x 5 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. Significant effects were seen for frequency (p < or = 0.026) and time (p < or = .0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the 30-Hz condition (1.010 +/- 0.003) produced a higher nPP than 35 Hz (1.00 +/- 0.003, p < or = 0.026) and 40 Hz (1.002 +/- 0.002, p < or = 0.028) but not 50 Hz (1.004 +/- .002). We also found a significantly higher nPP for the 1-minute post-treatment time point (1.011 +/- .0003) vs. all other time points (p < or = 0.006). Our data show that an acute WBV bout can significantly increase power output at 1 minute post-treatment across all frequencies and displacements, although 30 Hz appears to have a greater effect on power output than either 35 Hz or 40 Hz, but not 50 Hz, at all post-treatment time points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19675496     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b45bdc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Does acute vibration exercise enhance horizontal jump performance?

Authors:  Darryl J Cochrane; Hayden Booker
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Whole-Body Vibration While Squatting and Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness in Women.

Authors:  Nicole C Dabbs; Christopher D Black; John Garner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Vibration platform training in women at risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; Natalie A Glass; Najia Shakoor; Robert Wallace
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration training on performance.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Jeffrey Pagaduan; Edin Uzicanin; Fuad Babajic; Melika Muratovic; Mario Tomljanovic
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  The effects of two different frequencies of whole-body vibration on knee extensors strength in healthy young volunteers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Esmaeilzadeh; M Akpinar; S Polat; A Yildiz; A Oral
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Comparing the Acute Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Whole-Body Vibration Exposure on Neuromuscular and Functional Measures in Sarcopenia and Nonsarcopenic Elderly Women.

Authors:  Ryan M Miller; Aaron D Heishman; Eduardo D S Freitas; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Can Whole-Body Vibration Exercises in Different Positions Change Muscular Activity of Upper Limbs? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Danielle S Morel; Pedro J Marín; Eloá Moreira-Marconi; Carla F Dionello; Mario Bernardo-Filho
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 2.658

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.