Nathan Ridout1, Aliya Noreen, Jaskaran Johal. 1. Clinical & Cognitive Neurosciences, School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. n.ridout@aston.ac.uk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The aim was to establish if the memory bias for sad faces, reported in clinically depressed patients (Gilboa-Schechtman, Erhard Weiss, & Jeczemien, 2002; Ridout, Astell, Reid, Glen, & O'Carroll, 2003) generalizes to sub-clinical depression (dysphoria) and experimentally induced sadness. Study 1: dysphoric (n=24) and non-dysphoric (n=20) participants were presented with facial stimuli, asked to identify the emotion portrayed and then given a recognition memory test for these faces. At encoding, dysphoric participants (DP) exhibited impaired identification of sadness and neutral affect relative to the non-dysphoric group (ND). At memory testing, DP exhibited superior memory for sad faces relative to happy and neutral. They also exhibited enhanced memory for sad faces and impaired memory for happy relative to the ND. Study 2: non-depressed participants underwent a positive (n=24) or negative (n=24) mood induction (MI) and were assessed on the same tests as Study 1. At encoding, negative MI participants showed superior identification of sadness, relative to neutral affect and compared to the positive MI group. At memory testing, the negative MI group exhibited enhanced memory for the sad faces relative to happy or neutral and compared to the positive MI group. CONCLUSION: MCM bias for sad faces generalizes from clinical depression to these sub-clinical affective states.
UNLABELLED: The aim was to establish if the memory bias for sad faces, reported in clinically depressedpatients (Gilboa-Schechtman, Erhard Weiss, & Jeczemien, 2002; Ridout, Astell, Reid, Glen, & O'Carroll, 2003) generalizes to sub-clinical depression (dysphoria) and experimentally induced sadness. Study 1: dysphoric (n=24) and non-dysphoric (n=20) participants were presented with facial stimuli, asked to identify the emotion portrayed and then given a recognition memory test for these faces. At encoding, dysphoric participants (DP) exhibited impaired identification of sadness and neutral affect relative to the non-dysphoric group (ND). At memory testing, DP exhibited superior memory for sad faces relative to happy and neutral. They also exhibited enhanced memory for sad faces and impaired memory for happy relative to the ND. Study 2: non-depressedparticipants underwent a positive (n=24) or negative (n=24) mood induction (MI) and were assessed on the same tests as Study 1. At encoding, negative MIparticipants showed superior identification of sadness, relative to neutral affect and compared to the positive MI group. At memory testing, the negative MI group exhibited enhanced memory for the sad faces relative to happy or neutral and compared to the positive MI group. CONCLUSION: MCM bias for sad faces generalizes from clinical depression to these sub-clinical affective states.
Authors: Stefanie C Linden; Margaret C Jackson; Leena Subramanian; David Healy; David E J Linden Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Janna N Vrijsen; Anne Speckens; Alejandro Arias-Vásquez; Barbara Franke; Eni S Becker; Iris van Oostrom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240