Literature DB >> 19674603

The relationship between pelvic block placement and radiographic pelvic analysis.

Robert D Klingensmith1, Charles L Blum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this current study, radiographs were taken to determine whether pelvic distortions could be demonstrated on x-ray when pelvic blocks were placed under the patient in the prone position.
METHODS: One patient was placed prone in a neutral position and radiographs were taken in a neutral position, and then with a pair of pelvic blocks placed under the subject in each of 4 different positions: (Right Short Leg - Category One) left iliac crest, right greater trochanter; (Left short Leg - Category One) right iliac crest, left greater trochanter; (SB+) left and right iliac crests; and (SB-) left and right greater trochanters.
RESULTS: Findings indicated that pelvic block placement could create or affect distortions of the pelvis.
CONCLUSION: Further studies are indicated correlating radiographic analysis, pain provocation, and muscle strength to determine if a clear pelvic block preference can be determined definitively.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 19674603      PMCID: PMC2646968          DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60053-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  8 in total

Review 1.  Leg length inequality.

Authors:  D M Mannello
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  An exploratory study of provocation testing with padded wedges: can prone blocking demonstrate a directional preference?

Authors:  Anthony J Lisi; Robert Cooperstein; Elaine Morschhauser
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 3.  Biomechanical implications of mild leg length inequality.

Authors:  S T McCaw; B T Bates
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Leg length discrepancy--an experimental study of compensatory changes in three dimensions using gait analysis.

Authors:  M Walsh; P Connolly; A Jenkinson; T O'Brien
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility.

Authors:  R S Young; P D Andrew; G S Cummings
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  The effect of imposed leg length difference on pelvic bone symmetry.

Authors:  G Cummings; J P Scholz; K Barnes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spine structural changes associated with leg length inequality.

Authors:  L G Giles; J R Taylor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbosacral facetal "joint angles' associated with leg length inequality.

Authors:  L G Giles
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1981-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.