Literature DB >> 19673978

Asymmetric sensorineural hearing thresholds in the non-noise-exposed UK population: a retrospective analysis.

M E Lutman1, R R A Coles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the distribution of inter-aural sensorineural hearing threshold level differences in the non-noise-exposed adult population of the UK.
SETTING: A two-stage population study carried out in 1979-1986, initially by postal questionnaire, followed up in a proportion of participants by clinical and audiological examination. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers (n = 48 313) initially selected at random from the electoral registers of four cities, subsequently selected at random from questionnaire respondents stratified by answers to questions about hearing. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Inter-aural hearing threshold level differences measured audiometrically, as a function of age and gender.
RESULTS: Tables of inter-aural threshold level differences provided as a resource with potential medicolegal, clinical and research applications. Based on the average of the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz, approximately 1% of the general UK population aged 18-80 years have an asymmetry of 15 dB or more. The prevalence is greater in older than in younger people.
CONCLUSIONS: Inter-aural threshold differences greater than attributable to measurement error are not uncommon in the adult population, even after screening for conductive hearing loss and substantial noise exposure. They are typically of unknown origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673978     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01967.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  Rule 3,000: a more reliable precursor to perceive vestibular schwannoma on MRI in screened asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Issam Saliba; Mathieu Bergeron; Geneviève Martineau; Miguel Chagnon
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Asymmetric Hearing Loss in Chinese Workers Exposed to Complex Noise.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Wang; Nan Li; Lin Zeng; Liyuan Tao; Hua Zhang; Qiuling Yang; Wei Qiu; Liangliang Zhu; Yiming Zhao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry, and management options.

Authors:  Trung N Le; Louise V Straatman; Jane Lea; Brian Westerberg
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-23

4.  Efficiency of microarray and SNPscan for the detection of hearing loss gene in 71 cases with nonsyndromic hearing loss.

Authors:  Rui Han; Linge Li; Ling Duan; Yan Xia; Pilidong Kuyaxi; Juan Zhao; Qi Zhao; Hua Zhang; Yu Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Progressive Asymmetry in Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study With a 15-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Silva; Maria Martinez Kruchewsc; Joel Lavinsky; Henrique Furlan Pauna; Alexandre Caixeta Guimaraes; Arthur Menino Castilho; Alexandre Scalli Mathias Duarte; Agricio Nubiato Crespo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  An effective screening strategy for deafness in combination with a next-generation sequencing platform: a consecutive analysis.

Authors:  Naoko Sakuma; Hideaki Moteki; Masahiro Takahashi; Shin-ya Nishio; Yasuhiro Arai; Yukiko Yamashita; Nobuhiko Oridate; Shin-ichi Usami
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.