Literature DB >> 19673748

Schedule of passive ethanol exposure affects subsequent intragastric ethanol self-infusion.

Tara L Fidler1, Brandon G Oberlin, Amanda M Struthers, Christopher L Cunningham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that chronic ethanol exposure can enhance later self-administration of ethanol, but only a few studies have identified critical parameters for such exposure. The present studies examined temporal and other parameters of chronic ethanol exposure on subsequent intragastric (IG) self-infusion of ethanol.
METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats implanted with IG catheters were passively infused with ethanol for 5 to 6 days and then allowed to self-infuse ethanol or water using a procedure in which infusions were contingent upon licking fruit-flavored solutions. Experiment 1 examined the time interval between consecutive periods of passive infusion (Massed Group: 12 hours vs. Spaced Group: 36 hours). Experiment 2 studied the interval between the final passive infusion and onset of self-infusion (12 vs. 36 hours). Finally, Experiment 3 tested the effect of inserting self-infusion days within the passive infusion phase.
RESULTS: Passive ethanol exposure on consecutive days induced relatively large amounts of ethanol self-infusion (4.1 to 7.9 g/kg/d). Increasing the duration of the ethanol-free interval between periods of passive exposure to 36 hours significantly reduced ethanol self-infusion (2.2 g/kg/d; Exp. 1). The time delay between the last passive ethanol exposure and onset of self-infusion had no effect on self-infusion (Exp. 2). Moreover, inserting no-choice self-infusion days between the last few passive exposure days did not increase self-infusion (Exp. 3).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of withdrawal signs indicated that Massed passive exposure produced stronger dependence than Spaced passive exposure, suggesting that enhanced ethanol self-infusion in Massed Groups might be explained by the opportunity for greater negative reinforcement by ethanol. Although enhanced negative reinforcement might also explain why the Massed Group showed a weaker aversion for the ethanol-paired flavor than the Spaced Group, this observation could also be explained by the development of greater tolerance to ethanol's aversive pharmacological effects in the Massed Group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673748      PMCID: PMC2883445          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  39 in total

1.  Effects of chronic ethanol exposure on oral self-administration of ethanol or saccharin by Wistar rats.

Authors:  G Schulteis; P Hyytiä; S C Heinrichs; G F Koob
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Intra-amygdala muscimol decreases operant ethanol self-administration in dependent rats.

Authors:  A J Roberts; M Cole; G F Koob
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Response-dependent versus response-independent presentation of cocaine: differences in the lethal effects of the drug.

Authors:  S I Dworkin; S Mirkis; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Further study of induced behavioral dependence on ethanol in rats.

Authors:  J Le Magnen; P Marfaing-Jallat
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Increased ethanol drinking after repeated chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal experience in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Howard C Becker; Marcelo F Lopez
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Effects of fluoxetine on the intragastric self-administration of ethanol in the alcohol preferring P line of rats.

Authors:  J M Murphy; M B Waller; G J Gatto; W J McBride; L Lumeng; T K Li
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Alcohol preference and voluntary alcohol intakes of inbred rat strains and the National Institutes of Health heterogeneous stock of rats.

Authors:  T K Li; L Lumeng
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Enhanced alcohol self-administration after intermittent versus continuous alcohol vapor exposure.

Authors:  Laura E O'Dell; Amanda J Roberts; Ron T Smith; George F Koob
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Induction of high voluntary ethanol intake in dependent rats.

Authors:  P Marfaing-Jallat; J Le Magnen
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 10.  The neurobiology of alcoholism in genetically selected rat models.

Authors:  R B Stewart; T K Li
Journal:  Alcohol Health Res World       Date:  1997
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical studies of alcohol binge drinking.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; R Adron Harris; George F Koob
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Dependence induced increases in intragastric alcohol consumption in mice.

Authors:  Tara L Fidler; Matthew S Powers; Jason J Ramirez; Andrew Crane; Jennifer Mulgrew; Phoebe Smitasin; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying sleep-wake disturbances in alcoholism: focus on the cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmentum.

Authors:  Clifford M Knapp; Domenic A Ciraulo; Subimal Datta
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol in high- and low-drinking mouse genotypes after passive ethanol exposure.

Authors:  T L Fidler; A M Dion; M S Powers; J J Ramirez; J A Mulgrew; P J Smitasin; A T Crane; C L Cunningham
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Time-dependent negative reinforcement of ethanol intake by alleviation of acute withdrawal.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Tara L Fidler; Kevin V Murphy; Jennifer A Mulgrew; Phoebe J Smitasin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Effects of acute withdrawal on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Dreumont; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol.

Authors:  Cassandra L Versaggi; Christopher P King; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Alcohol dependence and free-choice drinking in mice.

Authors:  William C Griffin
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.405

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.