Literature DB >> 19673731

Resuscitation at the limits of viability--an Irish perspective.

R A Khan1, L Burgoyne, M P O'Connell, E M Dempsey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in neonatal care continue to lower the limit of viability. Decision making in this grey zone remains a challenging process.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the opinions of healthcare providers on resuscitation and outcome in the less than 28-week preterm newborn. DESIGN/
METHODS: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to health care providers working in maternity units in the Republic of Ireland. Questions related to neonatal management of the extreme preterm infant, and estimated survival and long-term outcome.
RESULTS: The response rate was 55% (74% obstetricians and 70% neonatologists). Less than 1% would advocate resuscitation at 22 weeks, 10% of health care providers advocate resuscitation at 23 weeks gestation, 80% of all health care providers would resuscitate at 24 weeks gestation. 20% of all health care providers would advocate cessation of resuscitation efforts on 22-25 weeks gestation at 5 min of age. 65% of Neonatologists and 54% trainees in Paediatrics would cease resuscitation at 10 min of age. Obstetricians were more pessimistic about survival and long term outcome in newborns delivered between 23 and 27 weeks when compared with neonatologists. This difference was also observed in trainees in paediatrics and obstetrics.
CONCLUSION: Neonatologists, trainees in paediatrics and neonatal nurses are generally more optimistic about outcome than their counterparts in obstetrical care and this is reflected in a greater willingness to provide resuscitation efforts at the limits of viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673731     DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  7 in total

1.  The nonimpact of gestational age on neurodevelopmental outcome for ventilated survivors born at 23-28 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Bree Andrews; Joanne Lagatta; Alison Chu; Susan Plesha-Troyke; Michael Schreiber; John Lantos; William Meadow
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Thresholds for Resuscitation of Extremely Preterm Infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Eduard Verhagen; Stefan Johansson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors:  T N K Raju; B M Mercer; D J Burchfield; G F Joseph
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years.

Authors:  Sarah E Seaton; Sophie King; Bradley N Manktelow; Elizabeth S Draper; David J Field
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  A transdisciplinary approach to the decision-making process in extreme prematurity.

Authors:  Marc Simard; Anne-Marie Gagné; Raymond D Lambert; Yves Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-07-14

6.  The attitudes of neonatologists towards extremely preterm infants: a Q methodological study.

Authors:  Katie Gallagher; Narendra Aladangady; Neil Marlow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians' preferences despite guideline.

Authors:  Rosa Geurtzen; Jos Draaisma; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Arno van Heijst; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.