Literature DB >> 19673010

Feasibility and usefulness of the 'Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care' in clinical oncology practice.

Ken Shimizu1, Yuki Ishibashi, Shino Umezawa, Hideko Izumi, Nobuya Akizuki, Asao Ogawa, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Masashi Ando, Noriyuki Katsumata, Kenji Tamura, Tsutomu Kouno, Chikako Shimizu, Kan Yonemori, Mayu Yunokawa, Yosuke Uchitomi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the implementation of routine screening for distress is desirable, doing so is difficult in today's busy clinical oncology practice. We developed the 'Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care' (DISPAC program) as a practical means of screening for and facilitating the treatment of major depression and adjustment disorders in cancer patients. This study assessed the feasibility and usefulness of the DISPAC program in actual clinical situations.
METHODS: As part of the DISPAC program, nurses administered a psychological screening measure, the Distress and Impact Thermometer (DIT), to consecutive cancer patients visiting an outpatient clinic in the waiting room. The attending physician then recommended psycho-oncology service referral to all positively screened patients. We compared the proportion of patients referred to a psycho-oncology service during the DISPAC period with the usual care period.
RESULTS: Of the targeted 491 patients treated during the DISPAC period, 91.9% (451/491) completed the DIT; the results were positive in 37.0% (167/451), recommendations for referrals were given to 93.4% (156/167), and 25.0% (39/156) accepted the referral. Ultimately 5.3% (26/491) of the targeted patients were treated by psycho-oncology service as having major depression or adjustment disorders, a significantly higher proportion than during the usual care period (0.3%; p<0.001). The nurses required 132+/-58 s per person to administer the DIT.
CONCLUSIONS: The DISPAC program is useful for facilitating the care of cancer patients with psychological distress. Nevertheless, the acceptance of referrals by patients and the reduction of the burden placed on nurses are areas requiring improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19673010     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  Nutritional and psychosocial status of colorectal cancer patients referred to an outpatient oncology clinic.

Authors:  Helena Maria Lizardo Daudt; Cheri Cosby; Darcy L Dennis; Nancy Payeur; Rubayed Nurullah
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Meijer; Michelle Roseman; Vanessa C Delisle; Katherine Milette; Brooke Levis; Achyuth Syamchandra; Michael E Stefanek; Donna E Stewart; Peter de Jonge; James C Coyne; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  What happens after distress screening? Patterns of supportive care service utilization among oncology patients identified through a systematic screening protocol.

Authors:  Rachel Funk; Cassidy Cisneros; Rush C Williams; Jeffrey Kendall; Heidi A Hamann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Yung-Chih Chiang; Jeremy Couper; Jing-Wen Chen; Ke-Jui Lin; Han-Ping Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Evaluation of Distress and Stress in Cancer Patients in AMIR Oncology Hospital in Shiraz.

Authors:  A Mansourabadi; M Moogooei; S Nozari
Journal:  Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  T Tondorf; A Grossert; S I Rothschild; M T Koller; C Rochlitz; A Kiss; R Schaefert; G Meinlschmidt; S Hunziker; D Zwahlen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Development of an e-learning prototype for assessing occupational stress-related disorders: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lieke Omvlee; Henk F van der Molen; Ellen Te Pas; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Economic evaluation of a combined screening and stepped-care treatment program targeting psychological distress in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohamed El Alili; Claudia S E W Schuurhuizen; Annemarie M J Braamse; Aartjan T F Beekman; Mecheline H van der Linden; Inge R Konings; Joost Dekker; Judith E Bosmans
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  Feasibility of Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management Program for Hospitalized Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Changtae Hahn; Soo-Hyun Joo; Jeong-Ho Chae; Chang-Uk Lee; Tae-Suk Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.505

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.